| Show Ltivilt Court Affirilled The Siproale a urL hood ad down an opinion loJ y lu the oaao ol O W Milts et aLrtfrpDUdeuti and the Sheep tl ck MuluL and Milling I company elvl mirmUgtbo I Judgment of tbu tit J url Low Tile text question Uvjlvicl In tbli I I cite was whether a private correlation Coo hvy I a ne < f attcnment on the capital HOCK before Ihe i overt of r tile corporation areexbtuited re the Oct I lictlonof I an i utitindlnir aiteiimenl when In coliritloii bat been rcslraltel by tbe courts In another lull and podlngD order 10 bow CROPS why a temporary Injunction should not Inu Tile court in old that the nlldl tyof IboaisKiment Is not affected by men a recording bat simply iui pet ds the roller lo collect U until the date Cited for the final beating The restraining order la thlt case woo Issued on the 80th 01 January 1S9S 1 slid IbO order to ihow lose made returnable Marub 2nl On the latter date there was no ap pnruce 01 the psiths Tb appel lento Insisted that the order 01 the court was In lorD November 20 1800 wheat tit fact element was ado hut the court fields that the fact of the parties not npieirlng on the dale on which the leilralntn was made returnable re-turnable nullified an J made Void Ibe whole procrfjlnif anti that It did not require au order from the court to life solve ibe resltahilLj I < rder Its life I coaisd with that ol them tion Can siquenlly MeBsri Miles A corapauy will be rcqulreJ < < tu pay Ibo at cement levied against them Tbeoplulon > Is I written by Justice Birtch and concurred In by JuBtle Affect and District Judge Coury |
