Show STATE SHEEP TAX Question Involving the Constitutionality of the Law Before Judge Norrell JudseNorrell late saturdiy < after Ion ho1 IIrgumnts cnobOmarrre In the Summit county case InvolUni the constitutionality of the sheep tax The title of the cause Is I Summit mount by John L Ilojden county lorn against llanford Oustneson The comrlalnt sets up 1 that Icl een Buy 10 1 < 07 and Aucust 23 18J7 th kfindnnt pastured 000 sheep without obtaining llcenso therefor or tulnB he llicnso fee thereon as he should I coo lone by lrtue of an ordinance pu std on April 20 1807 by the board or county ommlslonrs 01 SummIt oualr requiring low owners ci cheep shall I ° ° t yollrnncn tnI pstllrln the unit on llu I range The Ilcinse tin l mel on onnern nf 2000 nnd less I than 3000 < cluep nmounltil 0 to 1100 for which lalntlrf I oruys judgment The ohjctt nl the Old rnee000 to rali re enue and tho defendant < allfKdl that such tin otdlnami wan unconstitutional nnd < on that gtound de motto red to tin com llalnt The CIIO Is I a most Important oneln coInIng prnbalH ocr 100IKll The county eommllone 01 01 nnll1her of r00n tOot In tOo Stan pad ordlnanct nlmllar to thu ennclid 1 b > the Summit ounty loolle I The amount of the tax Miles from IC lo lOc a head on th 1 f 1 I onoto ooo I I etreero moollos I tloe onoo000t if mono hlih would bj I reaMzed from his tax eooou toO exited annually all Hit thor n Mimes of the ounty 0001 1 wouhl etrrm d thn whole tpendlturea moO ahl cnllnUcs Cc01000ly Attoln SloIeIolm 01 1lImmlt uunty anl uiorno 1 L n Ililnms node the arnmcntH for tho iHlntlff ml AttornejB Drown and Jumta II Moyln Ir rocoto rob the defendant Judee orrell nftil hiallnB 0 nrui rnents took the matt under advIce mont |