Show SALT LAKE COUNTY TAX State Boird Ihs the Power t Raise or Loner but tile M thod Did Not Comply WIth lst It i the Statute 7 Tho 3tate l Supreme Court his handed hand-ed donn an u Inlu In 1 inlikh It Is I hills that tho Mate board I 01 mallza tlon Ins nuth rlty to raise or loner the > aluntlon but I that In Us recent action In 01ln tile valuation of Salt Lake count property tic board did rot adopt p rich method to make the raise and th r t re Us action Is old The opinion uns In the ease of the State of illtah tx lei J A Cunning hm I ehIs Ih State bad of equul Izatlon r T1 e 1lnlon 1 discusses the provisions ol th Corstlt Hot and also the statutory ena 1m ItS relating to the qd estion and conclude W o think the proilsl ns of at thin 83 resiectl ir th ChdoHICIIlon ot taxable tax-able Property man iturj Such being tile case It Vas the duty of the board dt when aT found that t till OI property ot I Bolt Ulko county Ivan aint sond t too low before int hll ly ordr to de lormlnho IU 10 I Iualon on the rea cl nt to 10 ralul how much that or the Improvements Ihre rind h I Intoll Oint ot the personal pro t 1 ttfitir to a tit make all tl t I valua tl us onform 10 the constutst I I dlll i 1 and then to milk n i ti it I ncordllly Tile statute not v n b1 pursued lie order wus du it I n H also de fectle I ecnu < I untlunhd 1 i ny In ItB operation It Irl Inn not bt hld I operutl 1 I t tit n for ai arieais from tb r T 1 1 h t dollar l of therein I t ori ou m u r I val tied at I 1 in y 1 ruin money I 00 Val tod n I j I oUle < n add Alvin lr e tit m r in piir I i I Ium fto tiliiitl 1 lit 1 tin d tr tile Co stun Ical I ty tie standard of i n f r oaIln u a b I a I reports > tl 1 101 1 Ii jropety heJ COI i non d utl I the sm w I 11 It dl < lmlilullI I I Ilimh the lud I mcn I 8 I 11 I i t U I n a ri lot b YIR I I I I tty lxleilt money part I I I lit > in valuations and JwrissT ttU it Ing t tHe f 7 b human ji dgmei t IIF I i I I 1r ny b I 0 determine I I I nloj < that II U I wl at J P It ho I P ny t or in I nonoy to I a dollarN I I t I I I Iuc old Von Itnt c I it 11a cannot Tin a Naluatn I I I I ot no II r3nII It U Ill III y Th lIt bIg no tie l-It I I odbe As natter of la It I I i loont it ar > e too f I 911 into I Honeo from I o lungs the The Slate bod 1 I 1 Ill alu Allen ot On 3 I Th lon I roll almadr yWo il 1 I valut n 1 I onturn iti ar tit man 1 I u u oil llt it itll i r ti xpt tooney ot li I I rOn 1 r the order V01dt trl 11 I t i n sldercd In co I III t m turth fact ns sho I 0 r rd In this t cane that Ih I n board did not conform it U1 IT the ord r Car l not be ulh I d I pr t exercise lor autlorlty l ni rhl i i r tore void Having rea On 1 d this ncI dit Is I unnecessary 10 dlu any thl question pre ented In thlo raro JudKnient Lust lie entered In favor at the rlllo the the Order In rotation be 81 ahl Tile opinion In I written by Justice luch and Iho jud mnt In I concurred hy C hlef Justice Zn and Justice Miner n Jutc The time allowed by statute for the state boar of equalization to 1o82 I any year Mvn g exilrrl the n r man t as nn ify ath ounty board must stand for this yr I |