Show Ui U. UiS S I fAll FAIL OF MEMORY i IN BLOESCH lOfS H CA CASE f Patience of Federal Attorney Attorney At At- torney tomey Is Sorely Tried ACQUITTAL IS ASKED ASKED'S sP r h Judge Raises Ques Question io oE f i iC C Court ourt J. J Jurisdiction uris d. d If I Startling failure allu of r ii suj government go ki jj remember r rItal vital Ital points point a e their affidavit affidavits dd added little t to tb prosecution pr of or John Redd fetid f Weston ton accused In to U the ft fedi court Olin of having intimidated Hoesch on his bt hl hom homet t Juan Junn county I and nd Ht n are n hf he ordered ION h from fromin rom bit bid in the country wv IOU t t of at Monticello 1 on so November f itzi 11 i. i Th The three witnesses John Job 1 maker and hi his hia son on A. A S S. 1 maker and Robert Miller tuler patience of or District A AM At Cba Charles Charlea le M Y Morris Morri They tb they had bad heard hurd that PaUland Paul Pauland Pauland and his brother Louts Loul had bad cruel to their animal animals and that were er aU suspected of ot killing Waster Waste dog doa dogs The witnesses said Mid that aIng a e. tag hair to the was waa wa but bUl when questions wai wars wars' t them a a to threat threats to run ruD the tho leader oft off their land hand not hot remember tit 1 SIGNED AFFIDAVITS All AU three admitted signed affidavits In May regard tn to the dented denied t they lIy had reed read tl K JK J J. J Keefe federal land Iud had taken tl meats bant 1 John Wanamaker said aaM lie liethe the a affidavit because 1 It I formally presented to i iler bl her ler admitted that h he h. aw writing down don a lot of ot othe t h he could read only on t tits words Kord The at dato da t to hits him to peruse as a. witness chair Mr Ir Morris 1 saw w the f aC t further ex examination ml nation Several time Um he h. put pul flU quest such uch a as Do ou ou want to toll cu u know and Do 00 you 0 Math fl eral oral eral time Samuel A A. associate counsel tor for tb the dd k objected ted to Mr I Morrl craM hi his hia own Unseat defense defene did not nol cross cross- croom t 4 ler ter The three a as a. welt Walt 4 Mr Keefe were clear aa as ta horse and the man Incident all an agreed that Haul kaul h told that h he h. ought to 4 In tn turn carry the t teed steed Mr Kt varied somewhat ome saying Iq that ion ton had hd told him that Rt been ben Informed that ho ho hothan w a than the hor horse bore ACQUITTAL DEMANDED J. J Mr Keefe took t the be a a. a th the fourth go t ra of or the th da 4 day The Th In of 0 Weston admitting that hat Jw had been n told laid he would mould 1 lie ha out of or the country H Ill It ton ten declared th ta the n an J J. J would ouM not nut take aD any actton had bad tk taken laken I the V n matter mauer up 99 HI selves Mr hit King lOne ked asked a directed diet dt of not guilty guilt in I view of tee O l or of f the th evidence but bat t I court turned the motion d W Then th the court OUrt called altar U V the status statu utu of or aul I ut Boesch JURISDICTION QUESTIONED Wai Wa w. h he tili bd had be b. proved the ground T f Waa question n If II he h. h had d proved the tb land Ind the tho c case Nan wa for r I the state and nd not f for r r th the r. r federal tt J the court pointed out s Mr fr Morris made mad th the gover government argument contending that evee it if be he bad had completed the th work required Continued on pg pose Lt t |