Show SUES FOR A BIG SUM 1 11 1 I I I J Case of The Bank of Commerce Y J i Q I 1 John W Taylor et aL a i SItlS Ot 111 pErrSDA315 I 1 It I Mis Lodgon Ilin Latest Applicant for I JJhoicc All gem Itcsirllon Court Xotl I < ocaie of the Bank of Commerce j i To John W Taylor et al I I being tried i I t before aJury In Judge Cherrys court I today 11 This case Is an action brought lo 6 recover 7873 30 alleged to be due on a l > promissory naive said lo han been made executed and delivered bIO the defendants b-IO plslntltt I on the Oth 4 01 Maicb 1S93 It Is alleged that only the Um 012160 hat been paid on Ibe 11 note i and that the balance li I due togotherwith Interest and aUorooY1 fees I Defendants John W Taylor and lly rum W Taylor filed a joint answer an-swer denylcg that only 161 bad been paid on the notes and avera that the whole paid and fully satisfied 11 Is also 1 set forth In the answer and tif way of a counterclaim thai after the making of the note defendant 1 John W Taylor assigned 1000 shares 01 the capital stock of me Utah r talus to plalullUand was by It laken I as collateral security lor The payment of the note In lull when the time of I the note was extended to too lot of July 1691 1 having originally been maau payable sixty days after date 1 I la I also set up by tile defendants tot Ibol to-t answer that to the b1 01 their 11 Information and belief Ibat the Plain till In December 1893 converted Ibe bares of the capital as 10 Its own use and that tile value of them 01 that lime was 10000 1 Lm The deleudauis ask That the plain tin lake nolblnit and that the do feudant Jobn W Tyler have Jutg I Mont rendered In bla favor for The I ulQsrenoa between the amount due ou I ulloeDo 11 the note and the value of tbe Dlad mine stock 1 Bllzatath TCrlsmon alsj majea 11 defendant la the action at surely filed a tepoiale answer tu tile complaint and lays that lo the bait of her information and belief that at the Iliac be signed the note at security I or shortly thereafter ample collaterals monl were delivered plalntlll for Us pay U B Crllcblow Is Plaintiffs atlor for Day mObrd Richards par P Ibe Taylor deiendaulr and Marshall < t I Itojle for Mr Crltmoo I 1Vn aliversop i I Katie M LoJgton tiled a 1 for divorce against her husband Hall I I M Loogsan In the Third district court touay alleging wlliul desertion I l mutt a allure 10 provide as a cause for instituting proceeding I AccordlnE lo the complaint the 1 partita war Intermarried at Bandy on the 4 b day ot April I 1894 anJ on the 25 b of April IbDU plalntlll sayf defendant < de terled ber and bat since Jailed mud I titglided to provide but with the common necessarlts of life although able I lo do so In addition to wishing to have the mairlage bonds annuled Mrs liodg boil asks to bn btr Walden nam Ibal of lat A Lirlciaon restored loher There are DI children < Mre Ijoiliisun la I lepresenled by Attorneys At-torneys Hmllh Neilsen c Aliases ChI Nelson Is suing In the Third district court William Blrklntbaw et al 10 recover Ibe sum ol 1185 on certain promissory notes curell by I mortgage The Utah Commercial and Savings bank file a suit In Ibo Third district Bourt today attaint John U Bowman I ell lo recover the turn ot 19000 on two promissory notes oecuuu by marl taiu and fOBT 81 paid < In taxes lo I gather with IUloeI costs and ICr noyta less I Tho case of Mary E Judson we Charles X Tbokor was IIImlnd by Judge Johnson today on motion of the 1 plalutlll at also was Ibe come of William Wil-liam l llldd el al V W U Cromar I While the Came of Edwin Pill vi Btouewall Blookey was ordered ilrlck o from the caleadit Judge Johnson It I hearing this after utuu Ina Case ul Mrs Mamie Weaver I vs Jamfi W Pun et ai 1 This aull Is brougtt lo foreclose a mortgage on a note for fUO given by Jensen W Pills and bin wife to hire Weaver |