| Show IS KAXOU 111 lilt Htun Declaim by Jollies Moral In 1 sale Ar Istecul cala TOLEDO Obi March 2 2Tb long exieoiul declaim of Judge Morila In ho ouitol common pleas oourl 0 t At buckle 113 too agalnBl thH fUgar ttust lo waa vlollv I iroJ thU tlccCliU IS Win favor of tlo laler x The suit was brought by Thomas J Robot and Arbuckleg owners of a minority of tbo tock of tha Woolson Spine company agnlust the Wooleon Spice company mud leading I stockholders stock-holders American Sugar llefiu log company for this appointment of a receiver for tbo Woolson company the majority of whose a Lock had been bought by IbUmy Plalntllli declared the sugar trust purcbaacd this Block to Injure Ar buckle Jlroi and l keep them from go lug Into tbe tuger refining business that the business w a being run A I loss anti therefore the protection of the Interest of the minority ol stockholders stockhold-ers rtqulrca that a perpetualInjuncllou be made ngalnal Woolaou eelllu coo at a loss and tout a receiver bo appointed to conduct the Welcome Judgu Morrla bolda that Ibis matter 01 price 01 which the Company may ell its coffee strictly pertains to the Internal gromelll 01 the onern and l as long aa they met In good faith the directors cannot be Interfered With by court which cannot reatralu a corporation cor-poration from Bulling at a low price even though n minority of the stockholders holder co bow that mound bulno discretion would dictate a different polio The testimony bower allowed that Wolo were telling al a fair margin of profit The application for a perpetual Injunction In-junction IB I therefore denied With I regard to the other point the court bold the agreemeut ol a majority of f the stockholders to tell a product lora lor-a time at luch price aa will drive a competitor cut of business will not make the corporation an unlawful call oplrcy against much comptltor star liable for his actual loss nor ntllli him to relief In the courts A com potuor for public favor must bow 10 Lust Iw 01 trade that allows every mantodlepoBoothisown property II Ibo t orlny course of butintlINDia such irnn aa lie sees Ul Ibe motion for the appointment of a receiver la I therefore overruled |
