Show AM AXIltOIIIIIM IHCIUIN M ben a UirMrll > nTrle la lleitrny Cm pellllanll luachU lr be ferrelle1 Chicago June TA special to the llornrd from Indianapolis aayei The lnllina I upreme ourt hold that n Peach Htrporatlon width entered Into In-to a combination with other Col 1 our I loan ItMteitroy competition and ihrrehy I Increase the twice i al which an article wai Paid to the lnhabllinl > ot the Wale become liable to a forfeltur vt I to cronuorse franc hills The tlcc lun u In the rate of the estate on the relation fOf a prue uting attorney ualul the IortUnd Natural Gas an1 oil Company JuAirs Jordan of tlie niKeni court who vorols the decision I My In lull When the Dial socerke to dolroy the life of an Incorporated licitly It to I II poctet to how lam grave mleconducl eum act at latest by which It has offended of-fended the law I of III creation or Duane thing material whkh lendi 10 prudur Injury in the public and A merely Hut which affecii only private Inter eili for which vther adequate remejlei are ProvlJe1 here however the fact dbwlo that a ooriuiallon has failed In the die chirir ot Its corporal dulle by uniting unit-ing with othen In I earning out an agreement the performance uf which IN I detrimental or Injurious la the public pub-lic It thereby may be wU to oRnd ailing tho law ot IU creation and con equently lo fortvll IU lllhll In III fnnchli III to I an old and familiar nuln that onIlIlIo Is I the life of lead ad whatovvr art deetroys Cent Petition or etion rIAXM II Utelln the part nt the who sustans relations to the Iubll Is I regarded by Iln low At Injuries lu public initroto 0 MI It I therefore Licensed to I unlawful on he groursas 01 public polloy Th outhorillos affirin an a general rule t that ir rise act complained or by lu I results will retrlet or stills coenp Ililon the law I will recent such an act li incompatible with puhllc Policy I wllhwt any gerund 1 uf public Intent on I the putt of Ihe attar w actual Injury I ti the public |