Show STATEMENT OF CONDUIT CASE Charge to tho Jury Strongly Favorable Favor-able to Plaintiffs Plaintfs I INSTRUCTIONS AT VA111ANCE D illy 11retinater Corroborated INY oil flood S1 linaposises asset seaktalistal by tie Jurl 1 7P In the verdict awarding III Itcl to the plaintiffs In the Parley con lull suit Out jury must lady liven I loa quandary before arriving at a tonclu Ion Ties city I engineer had definitely l cateil four mile uf the conduit line from the relief lank at lhe head of First youth Street nearly ta the mouth 0 it Imarlao I canyon The mill mil hall been lxnte thin far U win elthlr to l > < along nUn iurveye1 far an Iron Ope I or If the rock and Cement can dull was ta Ile I uied for the fifth mil I lien I tire run lull was lu b just below and following the line of 1 alley i run Ill > l I ngtnerr lli rrmui told the ton racton this lecture the IIds I were ipened Tie bill were opened panel the city rl Inl le < l lo u the e m lull 1 Iho way Inatleal of ulng for the last mil Ih I inn i ipo anti the line for the lh Won leflnltely located just below the anal A malnl In Advance by the tlllll asset meas undnl1 send as enle1 to ly the Madero I for the work lllnalltfartlon I I l mulled Ih wok tract > r cam Into n net after Iho woN wit Ale hical with n claim for 11000 more test comprnall on the plea I that the City engineer hall ihange1 the line from Oleo And he tint In United ta a m n difficult fine for the Joist mill of work The exact statement Id 10 the MdIn Ior islet bills were trained by Cil to ray Ir laorterfus Wells V 1 wood llainarre Iilnl J Vo lotln still I I 11 1 Pull intnitoro at tho bleoldfli of public ob or J I KIk one 01 list 114terks anti Illusion Ilaoreloorsager another Holder This plate Mnl md lu Ih Matters friends upon Ih I I llh oven title pn Th 1laters 1lmoh lh thl I Point was n follows 01 Il ly will I now Ole You to state I me nearly foI As Vote Can what Mr I Imperialism Ir UPINI that corrosion reoPretlair whether or nor the rout of the propudool Conduit limit Ilion definitely 1104 ndOI An nN As I un artinewrilmr Sir 1 nor rrll mI this statement that P rot h1 nol Ilion located that It hall bern lintle1119 In I wage n tiecaupt of the rush With IIb the city vounell ha1 ol1 the work Pror4i with lh she ovan ensuing sea a tl book a dty one I oANJ thought Dd II was ariveFarr to I have Ih Work comiltallivol and put 0 Pi through so that water Iot I majail Skleit Irn Iurlr release an list A t A At ar at n ON er to do to1411T111hat I rulls thinkre I Considers I 1 n I that tie rrKrtbml In the olives flctlfono I the Irl that th different i material Phou 1 hat furnlihc1 I 1d at and hat I wullnl ob any Particular difference In bdn as ca I Whether turn I shoPot ih material lu the mn rrrnnlult That In the Ono rue there Wl ul I Iw I 11 much more material of cants kin I than the other anl hat wanted the retailers I to illllncllr understand I Hill If Iher till not almidrdo in befcr the 1111 U wer openeil tail thai h 4 nil hot know how loon Hie Ilrame woul be local I if tie sald for the Ono In the feel of the canyon It would I be Hit but If the JI IIt cangs Ulf throvietts tile IrIji would be masonry Mul still fellow she line of Partolys lk canal aloeut bu that I would b prullably I lorn speed or four weeki before lo I could Unnllly do lermlno the line or which material woul1 too listed Th Complaint was 1mmi 1 entirely upon up-on Ih throorr that therl h1 been a clasturre In the ron161t IInolh theory outlined lol In the tint Paragraph nf the Initruclloni uf the court to the Jury ITruetlans jJ Hut the Court Inilnirted further that damage might Iw rollrctM If no lm at 1 all hi 1 len liked Ir the Ian mile Tills Instruction was wholly at variance w iris = leading i of th lalntlRi and muit have I left Ihi a Jury In I a quandary isrrnucTioN nv Tim LOUIIT Ties gilt of tin whole caw ll I tin In I the two foil in tig I deal to Phase of In iliuclloni shell br JuJg llallll to II lurylThe The contract Wiseacre the city and nl Dtltluli A llllatni Ware late I I March 10 lul I If nl that lien what U called rl1 the I rani tAnso In Met testimony hid Iron locate In the canyon Anti i that Ones wai thereafter changed to a course hither up on she mlle of thin thi-n unlaln ni am ta snake I more dim cult 01 conotruction men a Inagonry coo dull the plaintiffs an entitled to t cotir the Increased 1 roil of construe lien Such Incarnated rookit related I mail Ir I tie the greater 1 ditiscul1r II any ter iemkityltiag the material la I Ihe new line nter me Ivana lilt the greater deilh If any ot the trenched m ll nw lint over what they would halt been IA the Ivnns I tiler I no 11up Cot if lulling the coi dull In tunnel to a greater 1 patent flesh inoul1 fiara Imso eccoary on the Uvano I Unit thi aw ad water Into the trenrhei asset I Into the unnrti I from Iho Ptrifys I Canyon canal If such How would not leave tarnish fired on tile Iuo IIn1 A nd the like 1N8TIIUCTIOV in Till COtltT Theme Instructions were In line with the theory of tin plaintiffs Tfur ivuit also laid huwter I tire line for she masonry conduit l land I not l n located owr tile last Still III Out CAnyon at 1 Ih little of the mn tract Missile 10 11131 Ih1 part 01 rn Ih conduit Ii I real within the cAntract a 1 ItalntlRa an intlllel In wovor the reasonable value of the work done on that 1111101 without rtfervlir to lite letters ipeclfl I In I the AV tract This Iwwter lit I subject lo tin dcmandi ot tile comilalnt aid the dman at to chI I 1 to tin I Complaint which mar u ngarlel as A laill if 114fliculare llalnlirr cannot < recover mArod than U I demanded In I the 011011 and in I Ih lilt of tomfliculars I In Fvrolsoct I lu near it their 1mnI DI These 1Ualon werp directly at variance Irish the theAry Advanced I tits plaintiffs net OuillIrporl their Ili lar vollnesses IgrriYiiflli tied seat many The Jury o1 lh u alfornme that no line hall taoeirn dennllrly waled I thA the lat mile but un ler the latter para grub air Instructions from tile Causes a verdict of > om kin I In fat or ot the plaintiffs was Inetltall I Ih llalnllrr claimed that 11lnll 1lmt the lino hall I Ixvn ihaniie I nn1 I oake 1 fair dame ngel Kiouo of lu h cluenin Th de I ftndant profreal that the tin h1 arts twain cluinard unit her fur 1nlllh t 1lm for AlAnuixem Tim court in I Irllcl1 the jury that ties cn 1141nilff wcroentlllelt rovtir II Irate line h1 111 been Changed DM else Hut the plaint tint vitro siontilltol lu recrver 1111 pfI I at hoot not iMen cluanwedal claim ilevolf InI I by tile plaintiff nor TI rdlcl Ii I n radical tlcloryfor Jlo Ih city since 1 the dienuumacke award are only 1 par coo 1 01 what rd it h 41 oily 0 win allowed by itftn I the pr Iris W I falskim jind V I dT t IInllffll fall trk 0 A that I raw ill In 4ef e i Dskhor city countra kl r silly I 1 slaties f = 1 ii A l AI t small 001 I damorrem A |