| Show I I RHODES G TSJ25Q I 1 A Compensation for Assistance In Frost I 4 Wing a Boodls Case I I 4 I Cilia ilLIUlllI toil 1 A 11ME 4 k i I 11 Jrnttvr and Ujloi stills C1112tus 1clltlon for n Mw IMslrct 1 i I MUc Until oOh J f if 1 I i t At the regular meeting the board 11 Is l I it I ciunty cnnralBsloneri held U < nprnluf at which all the members f were product ties claim of Hon L II i 1 4 Ilbodcs lor ISO for services was allowed I al-lowed out not until tome little dlicui I I Ion on the question was had The i elilm of Mr Rhodes reads at follows To service assisting county at orney I f In trial cvstt State va Morris November i 2llt to December 2nd 18JH and In full I for service lu same cam In tic I tried commencing on lbl dale December J hi eZ50 f Asltant County Attorney Walte was Present In behalf of 1 the cuumy attorney at-torney and relented the following to I the boarD I I I I beg 10 edvlio j on that Ibo pressure ol vorK tlist was put upon the County nltornoj Cluco during the iiiAnth of I I Novemtor ro d Doccmtor groviltigout or rond Jury Investigations 10 regartl i Ibolnlluro or tJIQBAlIkGf 11011 Ika Rod office criminal cbargo still tile hgo I I mount of civil llllgulluu Oor tax Gulf I termauldthe I careful Im est4QUOU 01 111I lorlBnl IaX quelloo wus much ILI i I lu necessitate Ibo emlloymolll 01 Bd dltlousl amUtanco In the ollleo and I lo aid 111 the trial ot the use of Iho Mate h 0 va J U Morris At I lie lotlllr hearings I private counsel appeared ty employ I mont but being uuublo nt till time lo 1 I III avail myo Ib of his I 01vistanect I decoded H WhO 10 omnin theiotvlcnot lion L I It llbodos lu Ibis oipaoliy and I hot to ndvlie > OU that I consider Iran claim for I I 5 20 presented by him for much services a I compensation lor the lervlcea rendered by hlui lte cellnlly yours i t O WniTr > > uiiL 11 County Attorney I After the reading nl th communl oitlon Commlsiluuor It bull said il At the time t Mr I Jilt Udell was cm toyed I It was understood that there i WAS lu ba uo eomlooalloo at least that was my uodrttndlolX 0111 i ChrlelphuTho question Woa ask duo COIIIIOUUo and my un I iicntandlng ot it la the gain a as Mr i Roberta W Altal think Ibo claim a modest one to oy the lean It 1 doe oel come 11 I any way near compensating Mr Recites for his cervlcee 0 Itoberti cannot dispute that but I bow will the people view II f Can we make them btllevo that the I employment of Mr Rhodes WAS a usA us-A catil while the county attorney Ii I IY away lu California attending to other buelncis than that ol lilaoOlci Ooddct Wo mutt do our duty re I I nardleta ot what the peope think cr I I ll I cay Mr Rhodes wan employed ty thoboard to assist the county attorney In tue Morris case and us we all know I that cue baa dragged along for sometime I J111 11 1 some-time It baa conn elled Mr Rhodes to t II neglect big own attain some ol which J I I only recently he bad to rut oft Indetl 111 nltely J 0 At the ritjuest of Ccmmlisloner Koberti Clark Reese was tout alter the IChrrIlit f cecord ol Mr Ithodci appointment r s The minutes tailed I to nay anything oWYlriYlrtl T 1 to what compensation Mr Rhodes I I abould receive Finally Commlsiloner I lieddei mived that the claims bo 01 lowed which carried unanimously I The next matter that caine belore the board was A petllluu from the school trustees of Granger and Taylors Tllle asking that new school district created Mr Qeddca laid be had t A investigated the matter t and was really i to move that the petition be granted I By consent the question went 1 over until the next meeting of the board After the clerk bad been Intruded to Issue n merchants llcome lu 8 lays Ibo Maid adjourned till next I Thursday afternoon Inroro In 1 II r 4 0 Following are the names of the logo summoned today to try the Marcie bribery I rotor Arthur L homii J II Voiinu J 11 Keyatr G B Holmes 11 H Vounif entire Naylor J H Woodruanaee J 1 Hvana H F arcinon William verctl Fisher B Harrl n H pencer John 1 H MnAlllsler J J latbuck Wllllaii Bbonel Ill 111 p J Stone Max Airman J 11 Nlcholi John T Lye IV II Bird Thomas McLaland 11 tr Irdj cl r mlo Cuudaei J E Oalllchtr l ITnry o z laugh Jnhn F Ilsroy M ICtni O H linillbrook Juatnh QtoK1 nt nllip Kllppli Itslpli K lionTrunk enuns 1Iy > 1 Park Utnry elm m W U Bmelloy entities Gilmore Stephen UIjyncbElwar Ilciicrlnt halt IriltillmXueil Tbo Pacific Iliuk Of Ban frnncioj led 1 a suit against Itano Tnimtu In ha Third dlttrict COWL apathy to roo cover tile sum ot ln 11 on a prpmic I ory not ixtcule i Mil 1 ilellverrd I plaintiff on tile 4tti of lost t June Hiw I Ins i Crllnhlow are Mtorneya for latutiir |
