| Show 11 I JUDGMEN T IS AFFIWMIT F nil i I I James J McKee Convicted ef Grand Larceny Amm I Must Serve Out Mn Term I i 11I I WHICH IS fIVE YEARS IN STATE PRISON All e 4 4 Me Intl I 10doo 1 at i Lt h is Sar Court 111041 linter wild rrra irtlli Sol at X I Ann Ill The Supreme court delivered an opinion n opin-ion today In the case at Ihe Hlal of ch Utah against Jamea J McKee affirming hit lilt 1 the Judgment of th lower court fan McKee wax convicted In Llntah In 1V Auguat in of the crime of grand far I 110 teny and eenlencrd by Judge W A Ott 1 I Duaenberry lo I Five rear In the state prlaon an llefore Ihe jostle of Ihe pea I She r complaint allege that the defendant IS atote TW bu k eheep the property of I John 11 Header and nine other naming ch nam-ing I them The Information aa nixl In 191 The dlatrlcl court charged him with No I Healing lit buck aheep the property of I I John II Header and a letter number 14 the property of each of Sir other lit TO the lion named In the commitment a The commitment at a lid that the hI to I ed voilere ih property of len Indiilduale when the Information charged they were Owned Individually by six f the Cl tame ten ono owntreMp was alleged 1 to be J lnU 11M uihcr several li m C tills giuuml McKe appealed him rates 11 The supreme court finds that II ruin I clently appeara 1 Man the Information and the commitment and complaint It made n fort uf It that there had b nan w n-an to I initiation and rnninliinent by file Magistrate aa nqulrd by the email I lotion and statute before the mmplalnt 21 woo llle1 Th notion uf the Inner uf stolen prupcity the nunt further Pays Is I nn t I Art of tile rime It 1 la I stated In In Ulctmenla and Informalluna ta a mailer mai-ler uf deacnpllmaaa the artlcular S apcclea r stock of the animal tiulen t PMsr kind quality or peculiarity of other pereonai I prurty token may be l mentioned the n 00 uf Ha ovotier la I menlloned for the purpoa of Idenlln cationfur greater Certainty new that II may U I aeorialned that She defendant was acquitted ur convict elf of a men I tat me-n oRinae that the defendant may not U I again proarcuted fur the aame iffenae that It may nut be mlalakrn fur Iht one ut which ht was cunvlcted tir lullIl other error were assigned but tilt I court limit no revertible one and hence afflnna the Judgment ul the trial court The uplnlon la I by rhlef Juatlie Xan 11 and la I concurred In by I Justice llarlih Juillc inner dlanla ItfTJIlic pillee Judge 111I I l let made the following or do s 11 TbttirrKon Lumber rml ny va Tits Plat Lumber llulldlnK and Manufacturing Manufac-turing aimpany decree for imw Tlii T American Trust and Ink In-k vs J IL Iulk nllnu1 for torns larenm llarrall va Mammoth told Mlnlnc comiMiiiy Judgment for plaintiff plain-tiff for HIM Wlinmoln urnllur and Carpet com rany va II C IMwarda plaintiff al romwLytehil Jaya addllbmal time loWe lo-We aecurlly for costs Ulah IliimlJng company VI James F W < lman Julgmenl In favor of plaintiff for ItUI fl M Oiliorn va John W Stuck paaaed to fool of nilen > lar Parah J Wllllama vs Harah WIN llama passed to frnA cf calendar 1 and order mad ahurunln time tu one day for Commission lu take teatlmimy on dpositlon AppMon Knitting oimtany va W R MHVrnlrkl paaaed In foot of Calendar Welnime J Illtchrnck tn lo va Pre1 r llouihton it al 1 diKaul of William < lnte beck and P U Uoughtnn < land l-and Judgment tendered In favor of rlatntirra for till ami cmna HludrUikir liroa I I Manufacturing company va J II li Wetxter Judgment Judg-ment for plalnllR Initt I I J Melra la 1 > W Madmen dla missiles William Mluta vs If W lleublian ten H oil I Judgment for plalnlirt fur III Ulwar1 Hlevrnaon via W J Ironlund ct all 1 Jtidgmenl for plalnllrl entere1 The r i Warren Mercantile com Pa it x Harry lloblnxin atrltken from Cal a r J W Ilner vs FISH Lake City cle1 passel 10 Intel lit rlnlr Jb Vises vs o I Hostility to celvoorl Name ohr Illitrlrl ln > rt N leA le-A J MiNlih la aulng U A ttntn In I tile Third dlalrlct court lo I recover II IK 10 on a certain pnnnlewiry note |
