Show rrs 1 01t AN IAHIV III1I1INU 1b 4 ARM n b join Traffic A = 1talues 110 110 WABtiiNuroN April IIu The Uullid States tiupreme Cour Bollc for Unol VoraJ RClllg jor tile government entered a motou 10 d vucn theducket the 21tbgml6n4t theJotutTiallic aoolaUoD 130111ptla Ig Ilia Ihclpal I trunk lu Tito lOoU glvu for tit a adnou are an follows he aitoolatlo Is cllmo bY the United States lo ill ale to bv Ito agreemen the first and second sections ui tile I tucalied aulltrusl act of July 2l i 1800 as Hell n the fifth Btcllou of ttiebocalled lnt lotittrs lu In1lat ommroo act ot February < 4 18H also t bi unlawful unlaw-ful luteilereuce with Internals commerce com-merce Irrespective of any statutory provision The agreement It I believed to bo Illegal under The principle of tile United States vs the Trausmlssourl Freight association decided by Ibis ourt on Martin 22 189TO Lot I am informed in-formed Ibis is contested by the defendants defend-ants or by mine of them and they will continue to operate under their agreement agree-ment until the decision ol this court lu Ibe premises The ease being ono of great public Importance Involving the right of competition of the railroad rail-road companies Oiimblno lor the purpose pur-pose of maintaining rates outs puuilbg traffic I IIOCI ally move ill pUIDI court advutce Ibis Oslo tj be beard at tile present term Conrad suggested the 23rd Imtint as the dale for argument JainesCaitsrlor theTraillo Reauclatiou oj concurrence I con-currence lu tbe uiotljn lo advance 1 f II saying tits l clients I were very anxious to have the case heard before thItalure metal lor the summer The chief Justice nnnouuced that the motion oulll be taken Under adhemul |