| Show HO COd Nolto n K Wilton appellant vs J II lugles prevlouily dismissed motto 10 eot ald ordr aDd retbeinienppeni 1 enled Frank A Cook anlgiiervs Thomas 11 Ballanlyne et al appellant 00 rlefs having been died lu thla case 00 motion et Atioroey Mlaoropo online respoudenls the lud mol of he lower court la alllrineJ with S per cent damages lu favor of raspoudenta WII McClureet al appellanla vs Jam r Little et al argued and submitted sub-mitted Arthur Pratt appellant vi the board 01 polloo aDd Do conml 10011 uaud by Attorney Ocar Van Cull for appellant aud Attorney D III Ueuipstead for respondents and submitted The question for the court 10 t decide la Ihl anee cu is I was Mr Prstt legally or III0Rall dls not seed an cblef ol police of Ball Lake Mrs MJ Lanpblre filed a lull In the district court today to void contracts con-tracts entered Into by herself and there with IbeBecurlty Trust cud investment In-vestment compao Ialollll aio asks that Ibo deferdama be enjoin rum ealorclDI Ibm |