| Show = = TIIIH HIIOIIII HUlTICi I It liccotnM ctfsary lo I notice once t more the chargi which I I ha been rc > i strolled i with nmnr thangoo and variation I varia-tion thai the people who form tho majority J ma-jority of Vlshn imputation have broken faith With the United 1 Mate There areA I are-A alf of our friends fur whom we en 1 Irtnln much regard and wiloort I opln lon > rt > enllllcil to resist who think 14 the Uesrtt News nhouM I pay to attention t I atten-tion In Ruth attack an they are not worth r of notice from Anybody I We 1 t l rugrf1 that they PASS by thl article t a and rrml other union nf thl Issue I of the New irmmirg tile very force I Jitw of our pubarfibers I to lake I J f I UrI choice Alto nnJ remit l what 111tames 1 i them I I On JVk IJ jji 1 3 tin nllMornvm i t iiriin In thl city made thin uxrlloni I I I Anln It him been iUmonstrale1 that i all uirr Utah are itoljgamou VIvtb w4irous Jlo ere not wh In IMS we nnl that ApostU art whipping In the pearile In ul troy the Prltstho even l taking more wle 1 I Alto that + Within the past eighteen month we f And < here wimirn nl Church nifHInn are IIrllnl young 1111 to to Into P017 l amy via find where wnn Ot the very I htirhnt ninctrn rh the Church t an justifying I justi-fying rurh > lormon as to Inlu inily I gamy etc That rotxt1 among olh r i rcmutkt of A Imllar tendency announced l We lime abundAnt prout to satisfy i 1 any tttomatlt ivrnoa Three stutartratill vitre mxatol and j ia ieralMl unlit It u declared Hint n I Users is l nillnj up With tialYnamous vim 1 vilio virrr not win vrorlull to the iiiatiir > to Sometimes that inan varied to who were rol whca before Btatthoo1 As otlilncd The frK Nwa asked fur these abundant roofi And wait created to n 4 series of 1lIhI In which the editor of this relief v > a rolled all the 11 names In which Urn antl Morm niM OT ran dillrhtf still hlch It I inl takr for At tnumtnta Ktlll ilpmanAlrit the proof wt were dersouncvI AS a majiurfln naeone of the inllJot tcrraa uinl Why we ahouU U > o treated t for nuklnif for that which was amvrtnl I to lit oil abundant did I lOOt try clearly ap par Hut at length an Account vroa llvtn of th alleged Plural marrUte ot A prominent ffntlrman Who Was On crossed l and tills was followed aum lime lal r ty a story About a ul1l11 alia ilrteA Ml I having been inarrl to I j I another Prominent nfiilleman hut It I WAR not mate l that the Marriage Wall l lr Jninui The lint riorjr wits one of a number of dllferti1 emlonn liver all of which was it certain amount of myatery and each ot which contradicted the others Of course we did not rewrd the Published story 1 lag Proof The other we foretell with Rome levity fur It I was not aliened that the marriage MM unlawful In fat no charge was md ill all In the article but we Here assets 1 It It van not proof aumclent Irnof til haw na our query unit thin limit not bern un > nere < l r Now we wish l to ray no a aufflclent I re > tHin > i > to all the allrml f fnI ram pent I BMerllona lllouUul ileilucllonn iruefwa Kiumlal rriirrllltlea and Per I t aonal ilefamatlon < Indulged In by our Inlfmpcrnte t ntemiwirary filet If cxerythlnir II hu laM As inallrn ol fall li I true which we dn not admit neerlhelew thoee abundant Proofs have not been preicntwl tll rulitanll nte the i ImrKM tlmt ull overIllations IMull4UA l wives who were not wives In Wit at thai women at Church metllmct hate urirc1 ounit gifts In 1 K ° Into I lgumyH or chat AnoitLa flare been Wlilpllnil tile prorate Into I > K amy j If Ow Ings nn rullnrlr touched I upon by the accuser rould lie proved tll have been lulatlon of the CahHI lutlon or laws of the Htalr they Would not commute the breaklnv nf nor pledges in I this notion or the IHllon nf any ronlract rnuml lulu with Die ro rnment They would almply lie irlmlnil conduct 111 the part of a very few Indlvldualn Who would be I per vonally ivniHinnible for their ofTenwii We tAr further that If comlctlona could be hail In Ibo vaselsand wo nro auto they would follow If the null Mormon Organ could only furnlih thoi wonderful iiruofn they would how less I lulollull of unllLUnmy Uita than are common In other States of thu Union And they da not justify the tndeat ut prvaelatrs and nlllora to aroune public venllincnt against an entire community There Is I no use la repeat tills per liapi There la I certainly no xoAI I pur I In the 1I101lIIOU exaggerations that ban hn hullll1 In We kllllll that the 1ld1II of the bureb hall placed the ban ot hla authority agalruit the performance of the remony of Plural marilaxe either here or elsewhere else-where and that such marrlnri have entirtly viuskl 1 In tills state and In title Church Wo tire rmlitwl pay Ihl under film aaiicllun und authority ThAI Should mettle the question In the inlnda of reasonable l I > file and t those t who have lout their reaion on thif question will have to nun over It until they ore fired ur Ua < l It etccedlnvly un pronubla I I |
