| Show I I i I I TIITAI > UCi TO WOMEN Y I I I I Advlee In the women ct > Utah from v one who hia branded them and their l I children vrllh tilt lint names In n full I vocabulary ut the moat opprohrlout I titheia In The languige It I OP near to ceiiimmile Impudence HP HP concentrated concen-trated 1 essence can resell If thy hould follow thai Advice and InJInto their ri It would be A MM m irnlia I for their aceuter And prelendd rnun 1 Peter I Allutlon Is I made In their rlshl lo vote And II li alleged by Ihelr ditrvclor that i Is their political iltlita word guaranteed II In them by Hit head of tht ilntnlnint I I Church here Of court that la K false Intlnuallon Coming Ion that source I II could net top ntherwle Tin head of I E i Iht dominant Church here hit not Hit rower nor the iletlre In regulate much I miller They Are purely political and f I Are Outside nf Churth dltpoelllon nr control 1 1 The right of women In 1 Ilih lo vote A woul I never have been pccured In them If their prroenl pretended ail viler end I Inveterate calumniator had been tic I 1 Camarillo II performed Hi pan In depriving I de-priving thm nf that right twelve Years ago It did UP bept lu prevent their I t I reacquiring It under Plate regulnlloni J It covertly pnetra nt lit eierclie nt I every Mvonvlle opportunity Tiny hold that tight however mail It It I true hIt I I h-It cannot be I taken from Ihem It It I Aim 1 true that no one wants In lake It i o from them who sustains the dominant i I I I I Church here The Invllillon I to them In use that I 11 right now offered by their enemy hAl If C absurd reference In polygamy In the I I 14 first place no one In this State or In f L the dominant Church liaa Hit alight a f I tit I mention In Attempt In reeptabllli I IT Churches treat The prrtenl head of that Church lisp In the moil em hallo 4 term declared thai no Polygamous or it plural marriage thill lie rolemnlicd un 1 A der Lls Presidency elthr here or to I I where Jn Von Potential place If anybody A I deilrcd to mtore plural marriage Uur political votes of women or of men I ii would have no bearing upon the mailer I In any way Tht vvholt hypocritical j appeal 1 It I farclal And lldlculoua I iiI There wet never Any attempt In Huh I I A even In Simon of complete Mormon I control lo establish olygamy by civil A = 4 law Voting at the Polls hud nothing y to do with It If an attempt In rooters > r It I were contemplated I which I It la nol I I Ihe question would not be Affected by a woment volet or intnp volet At Any political election The attempt In raise An alarm of n Probable reeMAblUliinenl ut plural I marriage U I phamvtul And Incictuable It would U rented with tile contempt I I II detervti or at A grotesque abpunllly N I but for the rradlnepa of the public Already i p 1 Al-ready ptlricd up by Ihe falpehonda ut 4 caihcollecllng preachert lo accept 0 81 i I ouch Pturlc an true We treat Ibe matter 111 mat-ter ttrlouil that II may too l know how i I lboo Churrh stands In relation tu the puhjccl uf Plural marilaget They have I crated entirely They cannot be > Per I torMial undcr authority or the PArtsdent I of the Church who alone hold Its key I There It no mUlalce about this l A I rlh rtll I clrvlnoiiy without that authority would be Mild not only In Uw I but In the t I Churchvnnj before heaven All Hit 11 I pretense lu I Ihe contrary It I pimply concocted I con-cocted lo deceive the American public H t I thJIh = I and Abe women of Utah at well at all i 14 a i decent men art aware of lit falsity and r undtritand motive that Prompts Its At I I It I publication I |
