| Show IN TiE FfflEIUl COMM Demurrer c fW M Gurrttjr to the llumctty Dandy Co I complaint ii lleged llolatliMi lit the TMle fork IAW Defenlenl IJeotlm III Jadl lion or Ih Utl i Com ThrMtwed by fire The demurrer of IthxU M normality to the bill of c capitalist of JACqUes Hlchird it Htnn ty r al I W44 riled In the circuit Clair tar the district of Wah today Plaintiffs In thiir I complaint which nu filed Itl June ailtg a Ullon I of the trademark law In tint JifinJjnt wn Infringing tnm their rights by elllng In Salt tdkn City an ImllaUon if llenncMyi llrandy < n1 l ulna fac JlmllM of their trade < n une device and label la And purling the d not < lan up In ubttlti prrclwly Ilk th > used by pliimifla The nun liti furthtr setout set-out hit their 11lrrO I I mtnufapturrl In Ccwnac France inj that their tradi namt and trade m k ure a the value t Htoo A wrK f Injunction wn wjynl for and an oruntlnK of ttit noom illrtvel trim the Minion at Pltlntlffi Alleged rights The demurrer met I out that the BUB ject Matter of the complaint li I nut within lh < jurisdiction of the Utah roan n that the complaint li uncertain un-certain etc Tin Ionic defendirrl Stan flied t demurrer de-murrer to the complaint a Chirle 1 Mill el at I at the port of Hiiln In the Island 01 Trinidad JtrKlih Went I mlltt n the rrunufariurin at what 1known I I Ang evuiu IIIIMT I lalnUffi In the cimplalni flkil on hi Nm date allifte A vlAillon orl I trade mark law with ri > e t to the Oita I of lhet urtlclrt and praying tar a writ or Injunction I < rtiraln dtfcndait tNm n further ntlMunc of Hit nl luc > Million of their right Tht demurrer li I on the amt grounli u thot nut cjte In the Mae of llotenliium lluthaivtn Company TI William I McUorntek ht detonator filed an Answer WOiy deny tilt all ot < ht ma i ml allegation of lalnlirta bill at cul > Ulnt |
