| Show I WHAT VI4 III tjUIIIIMIOIMT i Irish nn nlnlltM Into the ITnl < not n-ot mnerrl In Kialni with a Vm > lltutlon I In which pnlyiriimou or plural mar rlMt cref < rnr pnhlblte1 That wn rciulrnl lie the Ihubllnx Act It In Conilllutlon hJ not fully complied with t1wlroviolons of the KnabllnKAet the PriUlnt of the tnlled State would I nut have lasuod l l his pnwlitmallon rat the ndmlMlon uf the Hint The fact that he ilM Pd proven thai Ue frqulrvmonl woo Mllifaetorlly tnt bY the proplo 1 of Ilah ifry I now And aitaln the n erllon la I tnado by an nllMormon paper that the provUlun forhll polygarny i In Utah valth nn argument that this non much more than nnybody rlnlifio1 at lho Urn of ILA adoption unit 1 ratification II lit I just no well lob lo-b I aural vilsitto arguing A conilltu tlflnal ilie llon Th exact lncuRlt of n legal provllon otheould two quoted not n p remlon of II In order I arrive at n proper I ronelulon Th puriKwi nr the lojlflan I T that uw tile term polygamy IsixteftI of the Moonlit I wlynrnoin rr plural mar Haire t whlch are those nf this Enabling Act and of lite Ondltullnn il In pnno hat nn polynatilipt l rnn bo conitllutlin ally rlrctod to A llltl pulille imrr and that It be la I so i chosen by the preple 1 they break their pnnnln to the nation TM assumption may so well I in een through nM 411ppoI l tit t now na at allY future time II 1 rhuuld lj I undorli d that In the rrMtl of pilriainou or plural inarrlan In Utah tire lerma nf the Inahllnv Act nml of Ihis tVmill fortiori nr fully cvmpllM with Very lawyer In Utah pervelvea that lren the mUlymlmlnl prerlerof the lannuaiso of Miss < < Iniirumenta romprehenda II mid thai In I why hv chanson its Ian gouge Thorn was no Touch Intent an that pretended either In the minds of the cnnermmen who I iMMed 1 tire Knalillni Art or the deltnatr voloo trained tire Constitution Many of llw latter with tire IVetMcnt nf the Convention would hove boon barred ffimi office by those lii lrumenta If their monnlnc woo that now allrmilnl In lx I attached In them Th people of Itlnh never Committed nnjlmdy that they would riot elect 1 a man to office who hoot mnrrle1 plural l > elietorlhl < latOonitllulloiiKa frame They vn not nnke1 In doAn do-An They Aid nil and mnr limn Hut which wax domnridnl of them They I have keut fillli tvllli Iho nation If It mull bo imve1 which ust by no mean admit Ihnt the ftorloa of M > ItKMl viollitlon of the marriage law bf Mrs State were true they woull prove by their rry rireptlonal character charac-ter that they wore not tire mile I Lout that Utah In I freer from Ruth nRVnw than any other Into In the ltnl n Kiery story hleh hen lesson Platted however how-ever to ehon thai tire Conilllullon hal ha-l lilalnt or Ignore nhon troiol li 110 Poorest e tahll > hni Iho try to > uri of nhnt wua ilwrKnl In Ilia first rlnr JoITh The Depend Nevin makea no ajohgor W excuse fw Ray lulullunoflan Plate or National Th argument Ie nlmply on the hackneyed than nf Irrnklnii fallh wllli th nation by thlo nllrxed Inlatlgtl of Ilia Hlalo Con lltullon It Is I falso In fact It It fnlmi In I the Intent thai pn > ini > trd II It la I fill In v4ry particular and rei > ect Hi I loiter und In I 1111 II la I mad tu il IH Red Incense the American pub lie It U 1 rrpenlrd 1 fir n < ncerll that pretend In ho n frlrnd lo tile > r pl uf IhoiHtalr It lit fulmlnittril 1111 llnnlly und rrlleratrd In I malic II ehould U Prowl am It la I by rrcry think lest station And the enl 1 of condemnation condemna-tion should U t wl un It 1 by Ih people ir this IIIt and by artery one hn Bdmlria fruits und tinted deception and fikiid |
