Show t FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL 1 Tin Comity is Liable to the Stale fort Their Share ot Foods Tied up A II i t t I qauUoa or CIy IlIdbldn I i County CIh Actinic us Xtisly obUo 317 notable F t r K Loss County Attorney ol Wood ruQ tbC In a letter to Attorney I II Ii General Bishop molls the following I question b the county liable to the Btate tied school lead for their liters of the tunas which are tied I I up In lax tales wblle the county holds Ibe property I lr redemption Mr llisbop replying sayc I beg 10 call your attention to section f lfi J 01 ho Revenue Ad whlcb plus Idea A In ubtonc Ibal whenever property 80ld far = 110 Iho county is redeemed ibo money received on Peels redemption 21 oat bo dlmrlbiitod ai follows The Off glual tax and twenty live tout must bo apportioned bomeell the state anti mostly 1 beb being PFOIIOZLI taxs i tend gsl Suite tax Insole to the county ax nnd the balance pd 10 Ibo coo Aty Under tills oellon Ile1ly appoirs to he been Intention that the county hould hold meals properly In truil for the istatolm portion of the tax Incident Ibolcto This Mew Is alreiiBtbomiJ by I other provisions ot old action further mill which Ibo county treasurer In I required re-quired lo keep an aiciiriteauountol ouch money Paid In redemption 01 property sold to ibo county and must on the flint Monday in Juiwot iucU year lake a detailed report vtirlHtd by Kest affidavit of each account year for year to Ibo Stale auditor etc and undor much Sections ol the rovvrtto act mould bo required to cover the Name Into the 1 Main treasury i I am therefore of opnlon that yonr first lnlcrroj I tory should bo answered In the negative Mr Lee further aaks How far can the county go In debt What la J the extreme limit and shall ouUlandlu i warrants of last yoir he l clamed n > In bebtednias of this YOITIP This question the attorney gen rill says 6le J fully covired by Ibo re eoet decision of the Hupreme court lu I tbe case ot Ftllrch the county com in as Jones of Halt Lake ciunty repotted re-potted In the NEWSofMaioh Oil equitation of should tile cuunly repudiate all warrants of ur the county revenue U I also covered by Ibo same decision of the t Supreme uourt I The question lIrp again asked How far can the county Clark act In relation to making out papers In laud colts or lo gal papers like a notary public ort or-t must all fees for work In that line be Paid into the county Ireasurj 1 Die attorney general says is Under the provisions of the connlltu llou and the salary bill county olUcors uro 10 h81ld lIoodandloOnlt alarlo whichwero to Inolud oil mevicoxotan omol1 character Any rlo 11 pr formed byan ol1lr wbloh aro 1101 r Iulrd 10 be Irlormod by him under 11101 a w uld not bo nOlclal services i 1 And 11 dono fit such tlmq 6 would tlot conlli1 done him dllo asa publloorllior ho would be entitled to charge and collect such ponaallon therefor aa might bo agreed i ul > on btwou 1 himself and the parties for wholll such rvIM were performed and ny compensation do rived from aueh SoiIrco woI1 bolong 10 him Indlviolnolly and no ooouul nod b I rolorod tbrolor |