Show 1 tilt HlfllON IAH IIUUMJ 1 I The decision of the Slate Supreme j I court In the election ceac will bo ro f k calved icy Ibo people with ntlstsctlon F I I I and gratitude Tbls lading In not I cinHneJ IJ 1 one i3lltlcil putty but li i Jf soared by citizen of nil tuadts of r I j political o lDlos the questions raise I h Iff Involved lights theexerclsei uf broad 41 it cHJtonihlp rather ban anything of a 11 polltlcil tact aui while there wa DO I objection to any one questioning I I the I JI 1 Oa 1j validity of hi election lair having all 111 II doubt let naIls by the courtthe eelluK of the people wit that the declf II t Ion tbould be In a tine that J 4 conserved Ibo public welfare under existing conditions No doubt JU I jl 11 wa tell that dujiremB cjurt would H j follow the rlzut for the intesrlly I I Jernloc and independent fairness of i f I the Juillcei are lully recognized but theta was a little tineaaluiss with < om f4 I lest au error bid beau cimoilttetl by ord bt which I In defining I the auto I rule to i I follow It would ha necessary to apply ii It drastlo mcaiurci Uappily uo such f I t necessity existed i lH In reaching Hi conclusion by tenant r Ji I moui notion Ibo Stole Hupreuio court 1 hat entrenched Itielf moie firmly than t I ever In public esteem and loafidcnce m I I It has proved Itself n bulwark fur the I liberties of the people lu lualntainlllK l ti the ellectlveutss of their will ai ex i lueseed at the ballot box But It r t t atd has not d eon mu without I bavlnc 1 to I f draw Hues very closely and lawfully 1 I rbili I ebown 10 tile loieguage ulln lll mU I thedeclsou TJ gel at the ull 111 Ito light ID the face win the evident clot j I utthe court and It did thlwithout I ili I hesitation or cavil At the some time t i I It Indicates that the law Is not the Lot I that cOllld bo devIsed 10 conform wIth Ibo constitutional requirement and I I 1 In that respect hoods improvement > atonal tbe lelslalors can see their way door to attend to tie worlo l With Ibo feeling 01 general I relief I I and satisfaction that comes with having I p I tbequisllon decide lu favor of upholding r I II up-holding the law Is I also the Im j it I t I preiilou that the discussion aol t anxiety anxi-ety over the cue Trill lead the Leglslv I I lure to bn very ctreful brrealUr with 2 1 regard to constitutional mandates It ft 1 was not to be expected that the tint e Lrcislalure starting out wttblu a week 1 after the Constitution camo tutu tiled 1 1 I I and before Its provisions had received il 11 It Judicial consideration could be M ll j I < well Infoimed ou leans that mljM 4 arise M could tubicqueut legUlatu t neither will I the lawruaking Indies ol t I the future I comprehend every question t of constitutionality without the wli I l stem of further experience Hence I I there Ja 110 ocealon flit rolml I nations It In to hoped however III ever that the brief experience of legislation in IbIs I atate with respect to elecllo Uxatlo and sam other j Ii I matters will cause legislators to have less of the feeling that t some have I exhIbIted in the past to pass a meal are and Jet the court determine Iti constitutionality and cultivate lu I < stead to ascertain to the heel of their Judgment and ability the oaloly ot i each proposition before It 1 receives Ibo 3 I endorsement their alllintttlve vole Ills titter not to run close to a dangr P point when there Is plenty of room to I I sail clear of It |