| Show I h r Cool ihmelcon of r Cbrl lIeobloiappel 1001 ve Joepb l101IDr mnomoedeool w urnued before Iho Suireine court Ihl mornlUL und BUbuiltted lo tool body In i tbla cast an action woe bronchi In tbu lower oourl lor deceit file cjm plaint ullejui I that I uilract wni entflej tI Into wloornby plaIntiff was Li convoy 10 dolendonl 3260 acme of land dill cerlalu leraouul property In ColornJo lu txihiiLe for four iuri ol Is of real eBtatelu Oxdeu CU > Utah that he price I ol lute Colorajo roierty was 3ft t er acre and Ibo aggregate value ol the Ogdeo pro rrllrr expralooU In the ciedr wan 110000 thai de fondant made cem IuIl0lOfl and traudulcnl roirteoiuulloLB concern lug Ibo Ozden 1001cc lIon wblcu Induced tho pbalil II Ioenter Into the contrnc toot If raid cop neseol ollone ban neon trop the nnon erilcB would have Leen worth SUB UOO but In irulh they were worth only J30 14j thai mutual oovtyances were niaao lu nccjrdanco with the conlraul Judgment was niked for In Iho anon 01 82b55 Iho aniwer denied the allcgallons of fraud und cecoll dtules that a price wee agreed upou 10 ba paid for the Ogden properties or thai the cousldera lion Bet out in the deeds was orion understood to bo true value 01 them tout were dlitlnctly understood to Lo Uctltlout and that Ihu transaction was a were excbaukc of proierller made alter an examination by Ihe parties The lower oaurt rendered a verdlot and ud njenl for defendant and tho lnlullfT I appealed from tbe Judgment tbe ground 01 the appeal tonIng 01 alleged orrori of law committed by Ibo curt Ihla Afternoon the cnee of 1 LJ John exIt et al vs Kilo lootle el al appel lauls was aruued beforo IhoBupreme oourl This case was appealed Irom Ihe decision lu Ibo fourth district |
