| Show I 11 I DAMAGE SLIT inN TRIAL IV 11 1 1 Cae of II B Davies Assignee Against the IRE Utah Plumbing Company 1 4 Af ruiiTirr ASKS si3coo Of DEFENDANT l I 1 o For Allecrl UIstel sellout 1 nf Ilool III fee I aeliopomraese Court 11101 I Oilier Violet > l > ller > V I Juis 0 Cherry and a jury art evesimml today trylmc the IKMIM In the mae lot I I Henry II IMMtt 816ve 1 Against I Nat M 1 llrlirham and Shia Utah llurnb I Inn supply Company Moylr Zen A t I a CmUraei amwartd for plaintiff and her Conticarogig4ron Omit HuttnrianJ and JaMih f Itlrh fan AnIa for Iht iMtndanla M Hull In title rait m brought by 4211L Halntlff 1 li I > mover tlimn I lismAN ate from Mch ot the defwdania allcnul to lwvn Won > iienalnt > l by plalntirf art thriMifti the allecrd unlawful ae4iur via of the Attack of pluniblnj irooila and aa 1 311 Mla nf the llrcmhIlvle Manllary comiuny valued at 411AM l < Tb complaint win fnr fl that im Ih Ulh of July im the llt chl > avlt tanllary r mnany need an simadian l rntnl namlnx II li lp1Ia < i > rt ldent il and intensifier of the nimpanyi iuwl In It t > then it tall that an Hi Jnd of July IM Wlt t a > I Islas In ihamt in t 146r = llnowlrl wya r i llrlnham uador a will of atUihm I Mud In the milt of the Itah Ilumhlnt I pompiiny levied an1 trlie < l the Pool land l-and aeetu of tile lleMchI > avlea com I I nv do i Vri U thtt the naaltnmrnt 1 nf the UtrKkHavltn ootnnany Was fraudultnUy madt and with the Into 1 t = of iHrraikllnnlta ortollooi 0 The heallliK had not concluded at I rreta time |
