Show rcrelgit Corpodllcnt JVrorniy flniral Illihop trantmllle an opinion today tJ Mwrilary at Htatt Hammond on Iht quntlon of ftl to b Chanel a forelin Mp ratlon dolnu btulntu In th Hlan prior to tho tn artmnl ot ictUn te llivlie1 HM uti anl which hit amtnled II arllrla anl Iticreaieil IV I capital lokI lok-I tub III Imo amount Th Iuon wai whether t chin 4wntyflv ctnta on tach on thouiand doliari of the lncrra or only Ih nom lnl l aum of 2 Th oMnlon of the attornef ceneri I that th IMnllon of the Mla > atur wai that Ih < hal of M ctnti IK IIOM of lh incrtaM Us ehirfed at to 1 u htrwlx wuuM II Iv farUn cor i raiivna an advanWt over horn cor lioratuni Th attorney ntral adJi Tille th auiitHn li I u not wholly frtt frixii doubt on the whole I an mlinel u Iht opinion that th bittr pun for you ta i unrut foul J bt In r riulri Chi piyminl of IwMynv ctnu on taih ont thautnl dollara of In trim of capital lock and IIIM I Iht unlM to tniiliut propir pnxr JIn i In court If aiirltveil thraby and thu ittlli hi quiatloii Julklally |