| Show AUITlle III IIIJ 1commital fItr IIIr The Illinois supreme court with all 1 the judges mnMrrlni rond1 it 01 clilon lat v ek which ought to be a death blow tj all trusts unless they on Invulnerable The court derided not only that any Soft of corpuratln which hem In view the control arnl monoiwlli lion of the manufacture or Sol 1 01 a commudlir 1 elegant bill II went still farther lion tarelinisd and dI04ra lit lillevolmcan that no corpoorms legally Mi Itit proswrty to an Individual or cor PorrAtioll ofthen the Plain Purposes of the Purchaser Is I to create Ii monopoly Chicago Itccord Thir larigualto of the court Ii I that any oombllllIun 01 competing torpor ations Ir the purpose of contrulllnir PrIcen rJ limiting prioduciton or 1 colitspoutitlen Is contrary to muc t 10 111 cY Civil Is I volohl Aftorellne I III the ottitenvorit to f the court onve 01 the urwaei l of file gluoopecorublnatlon van to limit priHlucUon The contains thai dipemli for unit d profit upon the llml lotlun of priduullon mt rll count oil heavier Prices frum Ihe run surner than ho would otherwise to 010111 lu pay Th publlo welfare U I nol volvervtof toy the formation of trusts ihe object of which U the Ilinllalloii of liniduction II the glucose 1 trust an ewers to this dIIllon file criterion Iomnann lOr It Is I vonAntt by coesoldsirati4ma fit sound public Policy |
