Show I I BANK DIRECTORS LOSE THEIR CASE i Supreme Court Decision In tho Ncphl Bank Suit I i uusroxsuiLi roit CASiinit I J4RU1 ur loolver mutt Is Id liar allocated Voice 14 Al al AlI The Supreme Court delivered An opinion today In the MS or tile llril National Hank of tfrphl appellant v Walter I Brown and Mary 1 Brown Illrmlnit the judgment of the trial court Th Ulnlllt bank sued the defendant defend-ant UPI A promliiory hut fur the liked turn of II 070 No defense wn mad la the hIln The nottafain UMf con lrovry arue over 1 counter claim The defendants claimed that while they were Indebled to the bank ItS cashier Alum Hague loaned II WO of their money In Mr 1 W J He ley and that tit taller with others Executed a ml to the bank for the money Th note ease id but the defen lanl were never credited with any amount The bank claimed tint It ne er hal any money front tile defendant to loan aral that It Hague losses their I money II ajlII solely out he dll so aolely goon hli own re ponslblllly l The jury nnnaiwIM In the ra > e found the IWUH for the defendant upon their counter claim and o n their damage at ITO The Hut rtme court In affirming the lower court fields that the bank In re lalnlng the defendant deloual money practically acknowledged Hague au Ihorlly to plaoe the cash out on loan The opinion is by Justice Iliukln Chief Justice Itartch and Justice Miner concurring |