| Show THE DISTRICT COURT Cases Jl ghlnst Valentino Conllontd Till Hah 41bt TIICCASC AtiAi > sniuu r I u I lliMlir Call hbeoltot l > 1i 10090 91 Uamlgrs for in Alleged llrcacti of 1allli There wai only one mw tried by irylii the Third dletrlot oeutt lOb jornlng and that wu Ibe HIM foi 110000 dauiagit agalnet be U I II H Co by Curator Call which li I e lulled to occupy the attention of the gurt lisle ufleiiuoan and 1 day los irtow Tbo four cam agalott Chorine Valentine were callej up and oou llnuedtlll Mirch lolod 111 llroh Ith In tide ease of bar K Taylor vi A Cl Adimioa e al delult of defend aol A > rdere l Thu case of Cheter Call va lisa Union 1aclflc HlltcHd company wai then taken Ip In huh < cate wbldli yen bguo Ioro u Jury l labs yetterday afternoon I opUlnillt ailt Mlual lu IB39 no I IbBJ be entered lou u von tract whIt Ibe Union Iaciflrby which Ihe pfaiotihl atfieed 10 tell and deliver on board lie 1011101 oo 1 Aln und Hllllard Wyumlutf certain tim her ineelllii j I In bite 1 contraol lice de fondant agreeing to pay certilu r prices for thu timwir Jttwllut A Crltcblov appear for tbo plalnllUani Atiomey 1 L Wllllaioi lor thedef < uJaut > Cbeiler Call wan placed on the tvll < J need 1011 Ibta uiurnlug nud toXIHed 111e that he bad at Hllllard and AlIve 01 aol piled up In tlio niuunlelui ready nor defendaulf timber eillruitfJ tt JOOOI 3J L Iiuinlill 1 otlered la evIdence a memorandum itiowluK thoditei number num-ber ot cane klludeittlnhberelc deliv ek creel tudufondinl under lee onnirao 1lalntliri ciuntel aiketl wltnre at to tIm lone 1 luitalned lu I draicilng timber tu the cull tn b 1101 by leans II 01 Ihu illume of lIce uif udant comny lo putln aitTltcli or rzlenitua of tie tnck Attorney Wllllame Do you rely upon your miaiory for beau figures 7 WIlueM No elr on Ibo meoioran dUb UluJe at Ilia ounclutlou of Ibo ye r Detente objected on the ground that lbs memorandum wai not mad c lemporanuoui wIll Ihe worn being dour but after tbo work was com I bled l the objection wu overruled and an exceptlou titkeo WItness then gave the price paid for tlie dinmoit kludi of timber IlalutltlthenofferiJ In evidence a teller Ircm Mr Call 10 Mr UrltflB purcbatlug iRcut of Ibo Union 1acidt company I IJefcniu objerlvl lo the letter on Ibo ground that I wai written after tbe conduct was nude aol partly leer tormo aId that It wo hscareoy su 001 given under atli and the wflneiB should mutter be made tv leitlf lo Ibil came molor rialnllft deemed lo read l from au tborltlee on IOu < untlon and would leave II for Ihe pnmul and go on wIth wili otber evIdoncK 1000 Witjut tilled that the contract loIre wtiKIOlIOl the luIIU 05 lInIIUOI the letter referruei lo ai evideniu was Ibea brought up and Attorney Itiwllni read Irom lieu ullfraot nailsoclile to how thai a letter ihould lu udmlllid In eve denci I aide potty III hol II was ad drneedfulled lu uuiner the Ol elI oi though the letter bu written after Ibo contract li I made Aleut I a reply bu made then both letter dud auittcr should bo ollered together Attorney William nrKuoJ that theo the-o i i cited wire dillrreut to Ihu one now before the curt Iu thli ctte 111 U quFullou ofonnitact and white a let lerliBduiltudllli I fur toe purpoio if etlablliblug n fact Thli Ititlir cllered 1ll010fl1 evidence wai only noburttu ugulutl the fncb oainpuny and wm Out ovldencu of Uh I e eeceansujelloonin 0 leslar WOS not lulllbl 1010r 1 The puiritiili ufTired lu evidence Ibo kit r written froiu tho defeudnnl oompiuyj ageo to plalutltr aol 1 woe admitted OlUer lotleri Were also I preieuled euu of which were admitted noel oluelt rejected and it I < oclock l3D Ihe court took u recoil until I |
