Show AGAIN THE KELSEY CASE Difendint Cited to Appear In Court Tomorrow Ion on 41ratr 110141nivar 111 room 311411111nar me no store of tile l1rimporlF A supplemental complaint wn filed this afternoon In the Case of Hadle Keliey I vi ljwli I1 Kelny In Which Ilia plalnllll aviri that on October 1 Holes the I commencement of the action fit divorce and subsequent lo tile order of the ciurt for alimony allorneyi fee and lull money lie defendant list Irauilirred m his mother a Ideals quantity of rrdpttly that he I intends to convey or also I his properly or cloud or cunr rho 11 with saeutitilent anti colluilva I conveyances or assignment for tile iurfoie 01u depriving plalnllll I 1 of her illniony aud suit money slid of rendering any utility or decree hit may be made egaluit him uuavall low I luirUpon this Statement The lalntlfl liked fare ri > ttr > lnlug order to prevent such conveyances or Incumbiaucor and the oiurt Cranial tbe order OIUIIloJ lu Pursuanew air till actlouo and tile neceiillleiof the caI pretnulinl lu rho ill lallt of Hidlei l Keliey Juifrii I Miniltliiued an or > r a rurnauUiuit the defendiul U I1 Keliey I lo k1jrraf In court at 10 a m on Haturday Oc tober Alb 10 how cause why be tuculj not bi reitralned from luaklei tile conveyaucei referred I lo Tlili ortler wa served tills alternoou At the sense time that be had this business attended to thy plalntlUi at torney Mr Variant bad Nailed I on the deleiunl a detained copy of the n urii order lo pay allmonylrilbe II plalnllll Thte It I Preliminary lo run tempt proceedings If flits courts first order In the one mould h ulirgrded br the defendant |