| OCR Text |
Show THE CIVIIi D0CKHT. Htttlu; of Vtmt ror Trial at the erpttliilirr Term ot Court. Chief Juitloe 7,xae this morning est In the Third District Court betweon 10 and 12 o'clock, and made n letting ot civil catcs to be tried during the first two weeks of the Heptember term beginning be-ginning on Monday next. Thero was a big crowd of Interested attorneys. Quite a largo number of cast a were stricken from the docket, by the desire of counsel, as the call proceeded, thus considerably reducing tho list of 800 odd, aa It originally stood. The following follow-ing Were tho eelMugl SIOKDAY, (1MT. IS. Wm. n, l'Jatt el al. vs. John II. llORera. O. W. Heldel vs. Mary LatHl. Ueorge W. Kelloe; vs. Jarob V.. Backett et al. 1UR3UAV, SKIT. 13. William II. Hoy vs. Orson II. l'ettltt et al. Orson II. I'etttt vs. V.. II, Parsons, Bait Lako Sanitarium Association vs. David James. WK11.M-.1DAY, SEl'T. 14. Ftanrla Cllft vs. II. K. Ileoh et nl. II. T. Webb M. C. M. llrown el al. Tllt'ltSUAV, J KIT. 19. George W. Croiler et al. vs. Urtheruv 1. l'ratt et al. John Williams va. Ball Like Clly Itallroad Comiany. A. J. Dourdetle et al. vs. U. Ward. HUDAV, fcl.IT. 18. John Ferguson vs. John B. Bcottet a I. August Larson vs. B. Calcna Mining Min-ing Co. Ueorge M, Bcott .V Co. vs. A. Hod-don Hod-don el al. NoacttlnpaforBalurday, tholTtli. UUMDAV, fcllT. 10. M. II. Iluford it al vs. Ueorgo Webster Web-ster ct al. T. A. Davis et al vs. V. K. Morris t at. William II. Jay it al vs. II. F. Whlllnmore. (1. B. Bparks vs. M. Iilaokburn et al. TUUDAr, BEIT. W. Frllt Itlepon vs. Bharun Atkinson. A. F. Lawson vs. Alfred Thompson. John J. Cuihlngetal vsJohn Deck. WKII.NDiDA Y, Bl IT. 1. Alice J. Jones vs. Oregon Bhort Lino and Utah Northern Itallw9 Company. John Drolllngor vs. K. Am. Asphalt As-phalt Company. John J. ulbbonivs. Isaao II. Haiel-grove. Haiel-grove. niiunaoAV, sriT. '. ltlchsrd Hvans vs. the Northern Hpy Mining Company. Whllo A Boris Company vs. A. M. Woolley 01 al, Fred B. Hadra vs. the Utah National Hank. lltlUAY, SElTUIIlEn S3. William 11. Kellogg etal. vs. David Williams etal. U. B. Grant vs. tho Union I'aclflo Itallroad Company. l'.ureka Hill Mliilntt Company vs. tho Bullion Heck and California Mining Compauy. No further settings aro made, liiai-usKii or iiiday. Mary K. l'ead s. Parley lud. Demurrer De-murrer withdrawn and orderof default entered. Thu following rases went dlamUsed: Morris Beige et al. vs. Max L. Uold-stein Uold-stein ct al. Anthony God bo vs. Charles Hmlth. George 11. Heelone vs. Northern Chief Mining Compiny. Aaren Keyaor vs. W. B. L. and California Cali-fornia Hallway Company, Geo. Chandler et al. vs. C. D, Bt. George. Aaron Kejsor vs. John W. Bnell. Hyium 11. Kimball vs. Chas. llanj. com et al. N. V. Jones vs. James Glendennlng. FnnkWoolf vs. Frsnk Miller. Johanna Wadlungcr va.C. M. llrown (diimUsed for wanlof prosecution). Ijorenio Jells vs. Wlllluyton Beely etal. Loronio JetTa vs. James Wilcox et al. Joe Washer it al fs. B. C. Hwlng etal. The following cases wero referred; To Attorney J. G. Butherland: C. II. Wllckcn vs. Wm. Archibald. To Attorney J. C, Coed: Henry Llchtenateln vs. J. Wattert. To Attorney J. G. Butherland: Klliabotli Davis vs. Hyrum III0111. nulat et al. Marietta Ivies vs. Milton Ivies; Decree De-cree of dlvorio gruntid on report of roferie. In tho care of M. B. Aschelm vs. A. i, Ilandolph, default, Judgment for plalntltr was granted aa prayed. |
