| OCR Text |
Show (onrt .Inttliifii InllocKoflipColorlo Ml llnuJ nllw7 Uomtfliiy ys I . ( . Colli li, defendant, nnJ Andrew C. llrlxen, lolrtTcnor, the tit ft-mlaut Collin ad rolls tint tin tactWMl thosum ol fia III from cvrUIn baseball gainta, that li hMlioillilorlnleft In tin, money nj ii winiua to iy l "r ,0 "" inioii lh oo'' xntf OwlKiilt nnJ asks, whu In' ' le, Hint ii If dlcliried from all llabllltj to elllur tbo 1 Ulntliror Iho Intervt nor. Jacob Mwucrlo una" wlfi, Aiinl M. MmshIi, wcr8 'c'1"" Coninilnlnimr NorrellyraterdayidtoruooiionaclinrgB of ariauit, infernal ly Mr. Hr J. Ke llh. The orlle uro iiclgliliorn n I j lire near I lllli J t and l.luventli I Houtli ilreelo, and 11 ficms liad sdiiio uiliutiJftftamllLK with regard to chickens Hint veto allowed to tun at large. Tlio doftu lar la, nu tlderly cou lei wero dlclmitil allir n brief lecture I y lil Honor Justice Hall bss remlcro 1 Judgment III faTor of thu tlolenditut In thu rUIni and delivery notion brought lyll lltru Ijuigton mains! Louis Kolllz III tliecaio of H. 11. 1'lukirum M (J. F.Culnnr, llin ilifondnnt utuwir lug In tho Third District court, detilea that lie li Iiidobted to tho jlalutHT In tin turn of $500 for medical utleutloii dim his wile, or In any turn abovo I JISO. Answerer the defendants Iiim Iren filed in Ilia earn of tbe Huston Cnnui-try Cnnui-try Company vi. It II. Wlilttouiuru tl al , under thu firm name. cfWIillti. more A. Couipiu. JJelcudnnt C ( Whlllemoro denies tliat lio was ever atarlntrlu the flrm, ntij nik Hut tuecaiutoditmliuedna to lilm l'liu other dclrmtitnta deny thu material allegations of Ihuooni lalnt, and situp a rroMioiu lalnt In which tlio do niand III2I U clanmgre trout thu lain. till for aliened brtats'i nf tnntraot Thu iilalntlllM iluiuand la flti "II. Tlio enm of i in ma Bteul vs. J. H ewatt Hhurn haa I ecu taktn to lliu Third District court ou niitul from Commissioner Moytr'i court. Tim suit ttaabn light lu lliu luwir uourt ty thu lalutlU lo reenter the iKieemtlou of u bom which had lee u sold to thu defeii lant In satlsf ictlon of a feed bill, whlili had been contracted for bj a third iiany towiiom thu home had bven loaum Commlitionir Moyer found for tlio llalutlU.aud from Ibis Judgmint tlio utlindantapptajt In thrratuof Iho I'loucer Hivlngs & lioan Co , vs II I'. Mason ot hi., tint defendants liavu filed an answer aud cross comi lalnt. The tao of Marlliu Wlllltiiis t. Iho Hilt Inkc. Hull Hug mil l,oaii Assoilntlon, Involving thu rum if flWhai betndcillmi in thu tin ond. nut'a favor by ouunlHlontr iNoirell Another letter I in betu nalM-d from Mn Cnraon, thu wlfuof thu . DetictlM, now mvaltlLB hln trial in ucharku ot coni trim; with a nun named llrannan for Ihn latter to redmu her. otJIIthflild It la uddiuuied to Chief of 1 oliro l'nul anil run Hum Kiciinnii, Aug lit, iwi-i Clilorofl'ullni DeacHlr1 wlih to alatn in Iwhnllof inv huabau I that I hme done I lui an In Juilioeandl 1 1 linrul y ala o that I have Irani out that ho l li uoecut of thu rftarnu 1 1 rorino.1 ugaiim hlm t tliorx foreaik luuliijiiaiinoiii hlm thnl ho I roiainnl In Ida former lonlllon n. eliy letnllio. llupliw yuil will lxl ,.r 1 kadinja, I ramain yuiua r in(ulli, Mils 1) II Clii.il I Therhlef mya that a. thu mailer la I In tu hands of thukrand Jury he tuu I taLo nu action whaleer. J |
