| OCR Text |
Show IilXI) UKHCK DEUSIOX. Tile I'mteslof Joint 1'iclcs ofsiollold, 1 nt ry count), mi, (allied. The lU'gl.trar nuj ltscetve'r have gheii the following decision In the case set forth bilowt United Wales Unl OHloo John It. Icle" vs. tho application tu outer the mwii.Uu uf rtjiuilold, lluiery comity Utah. Un Migust SI, Mil, John It, I ecles tendered hoiueNitud umillcjitiou eoverlug light) acrea of Unl iiuw In dispute, which applies Ion wairocdved und made or record. On August HI, lS'll, Jasper Itobortson, at th it llmo prob.uo In Igo of Ilmory lounty, lll'd nu application to enter coilalu lauds (luclil ling tho eighty ncros) in behalf of aud lor ibo bctinllt nf tho cltlrens of tho town of MUioHuld, sun-I sun-I orllug sin h application with nllldavlt as lo Iho number of liiliihltautu, tlio non-mineral non-mineral eliarsrtur nf tho Inn i, nln. Joseph 1'. Ilmoiia and b. W. Darke, at-tonmysf at-tonmysf ir llcilos, lllol a protest ugaiust Ihoiillounncenflhu proof, on thogrouuili that llm probmo Jmlgo us nut tlio i roper ulllcer lo nul.o lownslio enirlen In Utah, and especially protesting agalut the entry of tho olghtj acres covcrod by the homestead tiling. 'Ino da a lor con-sldcrliigtheproot con-sldcrliigtheproot naacuuiliiutid lo Do-comber Do-comber J, upon wlilih dim ihoappliut-Hon ihoappliut-Hon tu in ko lo uslto em ry as n jocti d, for the reason that under th" ileeUion ' !';"'! ""."'da "mini. si n.rif ligen ernl Ian I om n n, (lin n lonustla ease, Ibe pnibsto lldgs In Inn lurlsllc-lion lurlsllc-lion to make the entrj .iJ.i.'e.r l,?''?'lwn appeiled from this derision and the ease las been ponding ji, since. InllonlDg H too text uf tho last decision "Wo aro cited by tbo attorney fir tho ""J'.-'i0, !"".,,le' m a 11"' ' ' sleolslniH limiting In sub-Utu-o tint Umt neeuninl a a hutn-liiinii I enibraood within ich anappllialon In not sul.rct to borne-slosd borne-slosd onirv, and tlm a cert itn number of acre, mav Im entered, no ivllhstandlnc the fact iliat each smillo.t legal portion ! not used fir inunlell pnri oscs, an 1 tliil n sotlleinont i innot loneiliiriil on lamls that sro eiubmred within a rrlor loniislturlalm "llul wo can nowhere find any law or itoelslnn tliat nul I narrant us In recom-niendirg recom-niendirg tho uinrallutlou of a prl ir homealen I cnlry mndo niwn unocoiii ictl land and subject to smli uuirv lWHue siibwiuenlly It Is doslre I to limliido that audliithelownslloentry. Thoeldenei Is clear that, al iho time 1 i-pIm inn lo hli homestead en ry, tho lend waubtct to fin li culry, was not then, and has not mill aim o up to tbo dnto of hearing, used for tuwusito purKi-e, ami we enn s-onorrasin win his rights should be aiiinni'irily net aside, estioeUllv as It Is apparent that Hit Mluroof tbo townslto eop!eUimkeibolrinlry In llmo was lauseilliy n nnaiigoueo or Indllteroni-e which In no inaiiiier can be charged lo Mr. l.cclo. Our decision Is that Iho I rotosl of Mr. 1 1 1 U-s has been bus alnr.l. and that tho tuwnslio application should only honousldertil lor that portion not Included In tho homctenl entry of Mr. lch, and wo recommend I e n Joitcil to iho esient of tho conillct with said entry," |
