OCR Text |
Show "(UllUIXI) AMI 1IMI.li." TllR Ugden ktamlard glvea partlcu-laraof partlcu-laraof an Inleriatlug conversation with "Keutuoky" Hmlth, on hla return from Washington We havu net space today for the full acoouut, and do not know that It Is uecesiary to rvproduoe It all lu any event. Hut Mr. rimlth corroborated the statiinenta madu by Mr. (J. J. Illchards lu reference to the "garblid niul lintedi1 reorts, sent to the Irttu'io of this city, tu ro-gurd ro-gurd to thu l roiieullngs boloro the congrissloual committee, and thla will belulenstlugto our riadrrs. The Standard reporter aikedi "l)o you coiinrm the staloment by Mr. ltlohsrds thai the 7nous representative, after complimenting you on your speech, said ho Mould hsvo to 'rosst yuu)' that his papir did uol Mill Hi., truth and that ho Has going lo liu about )uu like tho dolllt" "Yesslrllhsllstruo," 'Uhnl Islheiulntbo reKrt that )ou aud others 'doctored' tuo trsuscrlpilou of your s'H'ethT" "There Is nothing lu it, 1 made my eputch bvfore the House uuniuluee on thu 10th of ruhruitry, nii.1 before ttio -.eiiato commltteo on the litis On the Uth t retetvetl ths tianscriptlou from the Niu.te, but It was not until the ITtli, ufier the 1,11 nils hail llnlshtd thslr arguments, argu-ments, that I recoil M Hie report from the Homo. 1 found It lu a fiurlul slate'. Nut inoro lliutl two'tblrds of v. hat I said bail 1lu transr-(rlbcih A large uuuibur of lutcrllniatlons and erasures had been umdo, many u( them undoulitoJty by tho reporter. Yet bo told tno tl.s otltor jait had already ha 1 aibaiite at It," "Wbsl psrty dl.l he mesh?" "The Liberal party, I think -Jodir lUtl.ln.no lis.l It. but I can't say It with certainly. In seaklngnf the vetoing of the appropriation bill some six years ago by Hie (lurermir I Mild It was done because be-cause the bill did not suit his caprlco. 1 ho original transcript had It 'because ho did not see lit to.' This bad ln stricken out and changed to bemuse bo was not feed.' Instead nf rewriting It I changed It la 'bemuse It did not pliant) blm.' That all thero I In It." All this goes to prove what we surmised sur-mised from Hie iK-glnnlng and what wo gave uujubltable evidences of afterward, aud (stabilities the unreliability unrelia-bility of Intunt telegrams and correspondence corres-pondence when they relate lo Utah and her Intertstsand allalrs. |