| OCR Text |
Show 0;;i!en t'oint llcim. Jloforo Judge Miner at Ogdnn jeeler-Say jeeler-Say nvirdlct lor one dollar In favur ol the plnliillirwnn rendend by the Jury li thu vaao ol tho Deuver l'lah Co. Mi. II. U Urlllln, brought on uu ni.ncuntol 1112, alkfoj t) bo due on nyatera and II. h. Thociaenf M. J, Foley v. Uiilou J'acllloi railway wui called fir trial. The Jury rmdeied a verdict In favor of the deiindaut. In Ihla oill.ni Ihe plalnllll diluted $J'J3 for peraouui I InJ irtea alletcil t,. Mure birn cueil to Ina hand while n.upllnr rire In the frehtht yarda, ihrougli an uiitrno .'uu-tie .'uu-tie ting pin whhh alined tlirouxli thn bote In tho drawhondi and allowed Foley' flnverato eel eaugbt rho hearing tn theiiee f It hhi I)ur fee et al. v Utilun rjolfln ll.illw.y comptny, wherein J1J5 damaca uro claimed lor InJurlea alleged to hnvo been cuuted to tho plalntlir. by imwn oftlielfbilngauinniarlly ejected frml tinln near Wlllard t'lly, occupied the eiillro alleruoon nud will t re-aumeil re-aumeil at 111 o'clock tills ruomlnf;. TlilaiftMila nuezaut duplicate of that nf Thtreara Nichols and Drome Nichols v. the Union I'aclllo which was taken to thu supreme court of the Territory where a Verdict waati ndrred lorSlilm favor ot the plalnlllts In Dolour, 1897, tho plalntllls In the two vaiMa, nil of Wlllard City, were returning home from conference lu Halt IiAkr, all tiavellcg on round trip tickets which nnifrum Utah Hot Hpritgs lo Halt I Alio and return. When tho -Hirluj. wero renohed a stay of rulllclenttlme to en nblothopaHeiigers tn purchaiu tlcktts from thsl point to their destination was not mado and they remained In tho coath. The train lial rtached n point nbout half uny tetwein thu rsprincfi and Wlllard before the con durlot put In nnspirarance to collcil faros. Ho then deinnudtnl fifty tents from ittLh plalntltl which Ihe latter re-fused re-fused totwy, claiming that the futn shoull ( ft ceula The conluctor eloptoJ tho Iruln und put tho several paocnifels oil In the sagebrush. |
