| Show TilE DISTRICT COURT lIRE PttJt F Goss Obtains a Verdict For 1000 Agilnst till City JimMir los tiiltItfl Ill 11116 A lltiihaml bItters Ir M orw llrrnna1 Hanli 0 i > er Trlnl LUh Central K ctlttri At 0 SO tote morning Chlat Jiiillo Merrill began hli change tu the jury before whom hid too tried the lot iKWdamijfo < mil brought by 1eler K UOM aalnit Halt Like City TIto luron retInal j u1 before 10 oclo k I and at 1116 returnod Into own wllli a vetdlol In favor ol llnflalnllll awe log hiidaniizea at MOOJ it dale Otis uror only dl ascIi let Hereupon Attormy J II M iylenl oouuil Ion tIle plilulIU aikid for a fecial findIng ai 19 permanent dim agei or olberfflie Aa the verdict now ilood hue aid It Was autblgutui Attorney Whlliemore ol Ouuael fun Iho defeuttoe Jury havexirclHd their illicrvllan under lha lotttucUotii 01 Ihu court and we ask thud the verdict ver-dict Le lelt ai II I > Attorney r H Itlohardt aVI that tha vault would lurlher luitruil l Ihe Jury lo mika a i cuial nudlug Altoruey Wlillleinoru replied Dial he did nit luluk Ihe court could rebuilt the Jurun any ilioager boa ba did la lola eoargo Allor cube talk the Jury once more nahined cod wlueu they eitaht 001 Intocouil a low rultiulc afltrwarui handed Ihe cletk au uddlllou to Ibe verdict In wilting with which how iivur thIs plalnllll vouniol exireeeed dlMntlifAiiluii A wrliluuipjeitlouwai then tot tu the Iwelva by tho court ai follow In your verdict did you Hum your Injury the damagei auitiluid by the pMltt II10 date 1 lIt encna oil VeriUueJ by all hut the ouu dlulIlI1I1 Juror Itictmid lu I havu been alaioigener ally expuclod that the Jury II they found la tile favor au allwould call In ly award Mr Ou in mucliiarier urn liianlhat whlcu I liavadilnruilued < l upou I nraurt reporter of tbu Nkuawai luloruiud by roon1 for the i iiiulill Ihi alla cab thai ll li Ihelr lutentiou lo I bring a new lull agalnil Iho city tu reuraln It trout cotilluulug t I de1oeut llivtuwagulnlDlhuiurplui taual and fordama < 0001 0 lied by lermiuout Injury to Mr Ouuso boo A TIIDUULUWMe W I The divorce cua o Abraham Hunter TI Harriet Hunter WM rtcunlly heard whore Attorney J Muwr HI referee and Attorney Hirlow lurguian tIll murulug IOkJ JulIe M rrllt II lie wouU nuw lute U < m the rol Paces marl 1 tie JuJ n nDimrtil that iiu W4i tilt MI IJ tj do I in todiy nitltlitr coat lie uudrrUka to nima any particular Uiy all wlilcti Iiu would Uu i Hie ar uuj ou which the huituuai l iclillou li based ii ulutiUoautii and tlio urllw now railaiuK In Ibo Mtilcrn tan I ul Ito oily liava not IUoJ taititlitr tat HID lut aught or ten iiiiuibt > Attorney rugUHii ulln Kj iiii 10011 lor wluliK tIle iiiatttr dhbluoseul of at tIle carllitloiKjrlunlly I Ho aid I the UK onilnut woe lu the lublt of IIOIUK lalliu IIUUM la which tba liuibiuu and children dwull nlitu luloxlcalnd laklun n knIt wllli liar Iud turcaloU hog to 1111 Ito wliololit I 01 Ibrm AI I toruoy J 1 Id Hurd oa Ilia laB of tint wIfe mid 1 he dtilr l to ny luiinlblui beloro till liouor flamy anvJ upou tba titu UllbSNAM MW TIIIAU Tbl molUn for a new trill la tba rose oflljruo J 1 llrnnu jmlctel by R lury lu lodge tliei mutt heat fell ou alcharcu ol injury nllagolt lu have leu coot tulbteul on tlin lieurlui ol a cIvil suIt ItI I juilloel moth imila up lor argument Iblt aliuroo 111gby Colonel AlUu Mlllrr vn behuir ol Ilia Otltuaaut and by Anlitaul Dlitrlot Atlorury lloviat aol Altorny Arthur llroHru ou the loll I alto 1101 I tcullou 11 lia innlon HHI biitd mlu Iy un two utouiiJi la tui > il > uct 11I11I1 uvldvucv I tos liifeutllcluut luitlly the verdict and errori 01 law I occutrlujj kt tlio trial Wlimi llriuuani itloiney bd l jwkuu lor ahull Halt JaJga Marrllt aikej wbtlher lb > Ualeudant woe lu tbo wulteutlary Colonel Stllltr No all Ii b > In t anton ball auu ho dutiu iwtt to la Ihuro Judge Mirritl tcmirked that loon would bo a taut oh tile low clod luollun ciloudar la Al nil sod es tIle artu menu teemed likely to occupy towu time Ilk would 1oeuiobs I i the uiattir uutlllbaii uvya imnuriiLC tiutvia Uoorgu Wllllamiaua Wllllim John ion too IIIIIIIKOIII buy mod tblrtrou aud uurteBii ymn rr tolTtly came up Ion lIloIIOhllI leceuily tend guIlty loan ludlciuirLl ibarnlue them with robblui the I alflllB puiloHUo to hOe extern ol 1116 fbu dilondanti began Ihflr IIIIIIUII at Couhlll lu Auguit laU aod kept II up until the uiri 1 > 1 ul Junu cry In Ibo irtftt yiar thn WorD at IOlllb pd or lueaoi ol marked tolu Thn Uu > i uiada it key and with thlirulereJ auJ led the poll cIllOB their own sum will haIlIng lluoiieivti wIlhael lIIolIuall ol ruoDey lit peced lobe hand Alter a While 110 lock ol Ilia door woo aUauged but they nor oou mono actured another and ID tbo Ilium want on an Ill tlenuulisll ui beluro Wlien Iho poilottlco nmcclor took Ibu malter up anil 1 nurun a number ol colui tlm uHtn auli wer deteitBd and tlirlr glib was Ui Upon belmtarreilBd they mob ODltiilou and ulolldrod Leiwteu iU and Jill a > part ol Ihu plunder lodge Merrill 11W gre tlioyoiinit IbleveinuouU Kclurr 1d them Sb l each aull coamiluea ibtm lo Ihe lit lorui sChool ciiAiiuU WITH utruiAiiy 1 Kiln rboinai wai arrnlifnml on a charged ol belug oouoirud with au 0 her 111 a lurglarycorrmllliil at tin r ore 01 Amo H 1 Hriiib In a Ioulilo I lilt oliHouth Tellll te itreet on Jan 11 tmll Ill IInolll a dperot IolOkhlt Huns fellow about Iwrniyflvo yearn of age pleaded tut guilty nod telug utiablutu employ an attorney through lock l of nuanr H r Armitrotig Wos appointed by the routl lo Helen him rIta defendant wan accompanied ac-companied In Ihe couit rnnni by lilt will Rgeutrel Juiiug woman hoI i eel It ho-I apparently about Oi yearn When her huiband wai removed In the peoltinllary wagon ilia parted with him with much 1 ruluouucu end vault notknp Lack her lean I dllSCth1ANioutJ 1 J Mler vi Iliomii Ventrd On niollqii of difendanti couhtel thirty daji lime wai allow id lu H hit h Ionia and arrvu italemeut on niitlon OnUm lor a i new trial ilay 1 ol eieclilljli lu tha Anoi lowniend vs the Utah linn Mining Co llcirlucim beaT I to 111 Itrvunu let Ir Halurdiy Ihe SHrJ hoot 11 ler V II I > llendtlmn jndl I I Wllliinf Dmiirir withdrawn with-drawn thInly dayi given tuanintr 7IIH UTAH CtNVIUl mCMVKHlllir Central Tiuit Co ul New Vork I blunt Utah Central Ity Motion forth I reuuval 01 the recBlveri herelalorei apiiolnttsl and lo I revoke Ihu order aulhorKlngtha iHiianca if leoelveii oerlllloale liirlber I uN Ibucouit llnooloo 11 he argued ho cul overruled rnitioii lu itill I ilancr Joutt A Hihronler and Alloroey Diulil HarrliigUin I iran thu I ellllon tbd ceunrel 1 Judga Manhall and Atlorney 1 lo I Wllhaini apiarod 1 on Ihu other tide IVililoneri claimed that the iMutnca 01 ilOttaou In tIme reclviiteritllciti wee Improvident for tIle reaiou that It would ixhautt lubitauco and J tourer ol the rood and lliui leave the JiiJgmeut e < llol uniallilled On the other baud It was cunUnded ai being ab oliitcly ntceiary tu lou the leilllloala lu order tu I ruled tIle road mid Inch II to Ie I operated l Ial IIKUJHI J I null IIAIIILII Judge Hutch tat lu Ibu accent dlvlilgn ot the Third dlitllct lourl mollo Ihli morLlng and Ilitened to virloui In Ihe matter ol lo Ilrctchlntkj elI 1 I Hall Like Citr Leo llrofchln Ik Hr wai aHjlbteJ kuirdlau ad Illvm for bole ion Albert IX lluckwell Annette L lluckwell default decree ol divorce grantid on Ih I ground of dinirllon riioinai It lllnglna vi II U Hymei OUi r till 1 Molltn lo dlimlti o and tU god uIIJIkll blhll argued Iud ulll IU John I Adami Ituilie V Jolt pluto M ripear Deeroof for til nurv Thom K Mulloy vi L I Ie Couifle I Dclaull and duo eliot cloure InoebB 1 Bottle I Albert D llllul Complaint amended Iy I makIng mak-Ing Ueorgu SV 1atki and 1 lulu I 1aike kddlllunal parllen defeudaul |
