Show r COURT COURTIS IS MADE fc court has mado tho the fol- fol be e of cases cale for or the May commencing Monday May 11 of Utah respondent respondeat va vs Ar Ar- Jensen appellant May 11 II tho tf l Utah respondent ut vs v. J. J E. E t tt d s1 1 appellants appell May r ra- ra 11 state tl elt l J J. J R. R Davis flavis petitioner r. r vs B I lot dot of examiners of the state of Utah Ill 11 Albert Ib rt A A. A Law count county nt vs Thomas Smith re re- deal tnt M Jbv v 12 Elizabeth Lund ap ap- rit nI vs J. J F F. Wilcox respondent 12 J. J J C. C ONeill O'Neill appellant vs Western Railway Utah Idaho Sugar company v Vs 8 W. W If H. ot et a al I d ct May 13 Owen On-en Morgan relent re rc re- re I Ilent lent vs William Simmons appel appel- Ma May Ia 13 Cole Col Banking D company Silent ident vs s J. J A. A Hansel and C. C G. G ir sir air appellants May Ma 13 R. R 13 B. WilD Wili Wil- Wil Oregon Short Lino D i appellant vs g old oid company respondent Ma l May r 14 respondent David Ian a 1 Henker v. v ar 4 appellant May ay 14 A. A E E. Snow lla ait Dt h. h s E E. E M. M West et at al ap- ap tIe ats May Mav 14 H K Iv A. A Pennington ton re re- list lilt vs Redman Van and anal Storage e my et ct al at appellants May 15 Creek Land and ana L. L S. S company COmpall apat ap ap- at nt vs Annie AnDie Anderson n. n ct et al aL relent re re- re- re lent lents May 15 Mrs Irs 0 W W. Wv Benson pleat dent vs S Ore Oregon on Short Lino Line Rail Rail- company appellant May l 15 So So- Condie respondent vs Rio Grande Granlo ertl as ro av company compan a appellant lant 18 T. T 1 F r. Daly respondent vs YS W. W iJ et ai id appellants Ma May 18 i er fr Brothers bankers respondents G IG appellant May 18 Sc Sc- N S Bouko ki et al tJ appellants vs S Sr T r C C. C Jacobsen n et al a respondents 19 Jennie Larson Larsen appellant vs Lake City et al at respondents May fay tyrant appellant vs Lizzio Lizzie JB JD and F. F W W. Becker Bc respondents 19 Ig A. A E. E Payne n appellant fl an t vs 5 01 Ho Hodson OD respondent May 20 SaW Sa- Sa W lv Christensen appellant vs S Su Su- Williams t etc ete respond lUj 20 J J S. S ct et al tl ap- ap ats VI T T. IJ It Bulge ct et al a respond respond- hay Yay 20 1 F. F W Little ct et al relents re- re lents ft vs Agnes Acnes G. G et May 21 |