| OCR Text |
Show Tho Alex.ttuliT llvtclliii";. Wiiii regard to thu suit of J. K. ntirnham et al. vs. D. Alexander A. Co., Mrs. Alexnu Itr lllcd her uuswer atnlaluhotir jctttrday afternoon tn thu trillion of the receiver, In which the latter aikel that bu might hu put lntooFsetalou of thu rrsldouro which Mis. Alexander occupies. Bhu deules that thu properly waa embraced in tbo umlgumtnt as made by her husband to 11. Btriumnn, Jr., and further, that Hie fallud to pay thu rent, or tint tbo receiver re-ceiver bad to pay It to prevent tho Icasu from expiring. It npputra from her answer that her husband leased Iho ground for twcnty.Uvu years aud erected a ctslly liouio upon It. l'uiir months btfure Ills uitlgiimeiil ho co live li-ve ed thu lento to her, uud she claims thu properly undt r tuuli Irnutfer, 1 hu turelNer alleges (but Ibu tonvejanco was fraululout, and prays that be may bu put Into posaesalon of Ihoproierty, Thuliousuls mi Muln street Ittwcmi Hilrd and rourlb ttouth nud Is quite a aubttuutlal structuri. |
