| Show A IjUKMiniy Uf UOMJJ1IIS Important uddltlon to tha Utll literature of the country It 1 a little work by 1rof BhulziQoverulU u Uernun economltt who lui completed a lorlet of exbautllve iludliu an to tOo relation uf wage to Iho coil of labor That lila vlewi aiu 1 In acoord with thu urgu mol of leading larlUrefjrm In thu United Htatu will mini I I be ufllclonl region for theft rejection by n large proportion of Ainirlcaii economliU and pat slay Ole drduo lions directly aiull the value of he oomparlioui of I aje raIN for the Uullod Hlatti and dlbtr counUlae 10 ItKjuciitly nun In I toe argumnle 01 high prolectlouliti It uucnt to Lv worth oho while of Ibo latter lo glvu him lunio attoulon If I only for Ibo purpotuof Itttnollihlughlni Thu li I the gauntlet which ho boldly throw down Where tho coat uf f labjr n I low at Ihu oondltiont of jailOr are moil favorable IOu wurklog day li ihorlebt and tbu wtekly wage of optr allvetarublgheit flub meant If It It true thatthu ojraparitoniof wag role 10 approvingly quoted In favor of the American wurknuu It wortliluti nt proof at Ij the coot of labor per unit ol product In other word while oho Utrnmu lUtlitlclan find that wngv m hit country and Bwllierluud art lower than In KnglauJ amid i lower in England than In the United rilatii yet iili oilculatlooi nhow him that to lb I WcAving nillli uf tho two Opt named vountrloi the wrk y product pro-duct per worker li I only tat yarui a > compnred with Ill yard in Jnlau i andluyardi I m ibo UulleJ Btatcs mil U would term lo come aL u 1M tho higher wage rao accouii > L r eauees n loser coat 01 production rtiulljuit II uppOllto el tint clalrui or the higher wage rate by Ibo lilg arlfl Iplc i To thc > a latter who are gentrall imply able to lake care of their tl < d < n debate those ojncluiloni ate oo n vended ai itorlhy ol notice Ti > Sew glee tilt nijli pue and unloenco to them Leoiuia lull rube ui u outing Interntlng an really lnix 3 ltint it lelllit on tile grcn ulJectof Illooni 110111111 contention |
