| OCR Text |
Show ZANB MP BARTCH, I Both Judges Held a Session of Court I This Homing, HIMtl: IS Till: III 1,1, OF I'AUf., I .Suit ou n rroinltiory Note Prank Mil. H ler't I'aso lllimljicd by I In I'roso- H eiillon. About a fsclllcmtnt H After a storm eotnci u calm. M Whereas yciterjay's proceeding! In ,H tho court In which Judgn Ztnu H preildea wat ou Tutidy,bolh inorulng H aud afternoon, tho arena of nn extra M ordinary aceue between two prominent M attorneya of tho Bolt Lake bar aa re. H ported lu the prevlout lnuo of thu M Nmvs thli forenoon's program waa a very tamo one. Judge llirtch again exchanged leati with Chief Juitlco H Ziini-,thu latter once lutru devoting lilt attention to thu argumeuta of countel M on the motion of Colin Ilros. for a new M trlalln thucasucf V. M. C. Sllva va W. L. l'lckard etnl, which matter wat M begun jesterdoy morning, 'lhenrgu. M mem were returned today an! weru M itlllgolug forward at noun. M Thu following case ,cimi before M Judge llarlch: B IT 18 NOW HONi: WITH. Aatlttant District Attorney Stephen M called utteutlon to thu case of the H l'eople va Frank Miller, the second hand dealer, whloh bad been set down H for dlspotal today. Coumel said hu H now desired to havo the charge dls- Ll missed, and uskud that an order la H o, tired to that efleot. Hu had con- H lulled with Dlitrlct Attorney Judd In M regard to thu matter, and tho opinion H of them both wat that, uuder tho M clrctiuislauecv, thli oourau should be oaal adopted. H Judgu Ilartch Let tho order bo H made. ffH Thlalathucair, rtadertof tho News H will recollect, In which Attorney l'at- tlsou charged thu defendant wltn em- H be ill I ii g cerlalu houiohold goods H belouglug lo him. It wut shown, H hot ever, after Miller' couvlcllon, H that 1'aitlsou had mado reckless anil H untrue tlatemeiita ou tho witness- H stand when under oath, and it H resulted in thu attorney's disbarment H lu open court by Judge Zmo. 1 i'AMi:ii. H Attorney llawllna atked thai the LH caie ol Dinw ooJoy vt Salt Like couu- ty might bo ptued, a It waa lu pro- H ceaa uf tetllement. The reiiueat war B granted. M Thla la a tult In which damage aru ,H claimed fjr the alleged wrongful re- iH moval of gravel from land belonging H to the plalulllTIn the vicinity of Sugar iH Houso ward. iH I-U1T ON A fllOUlfcsOllV hOTli JH Thu trial ol tbe case of Saroli ttrTfM (Ireeuteaf vs. J. K. Derkley, W. W. H Itiudolpb und M. Ilusli Warner, thu H lait named of whom Is now deceased. B Tim action wu brought tJ recover thu B turn ol $M0 ou a pre-mlssory uole.wltli M lutereitatthuraluof one per cent per H mouth from January 23ih, lb'JI. H A Homey Frault 1'lercu represented iH th plalnttll; for the defendants Judgu M l'owert aim Attorney D. N, Straup H appeared. M Tbedtfenso was that thethrcude- M fuadunts, at suretle on the note, weru IjH never nolllloj of au extension of tlmo H mate lu regard thereto when the notu B hid reached maturity. H Tim ca,o waa In full awing at a. SO B tula afternoon, H |
