Show 0 FIGURES PROVE THAT THE POOR f o HAVE MORE CHILDREN THAN THE RICH o o Senator Clarks Clark's grandson W. W A A. ClerIC II Is the most mOAt Interesting o baby of or the moment having Inherited on account of ot being the he first grandson grand grand- 0 son on from hl his grandfather nn her Greater by far is the fortune t that lt 0 o 0 awaits the longe longed for for heir to the Russian throne Three of or the continental o 0 countries have hac no male heirs Austria Belgium and Italy The excess of or 0 0 female over male heirs In Denmark's noble families threatens the 0 o 0 tion of certain lines Jines 0 0 In the last quarter of a century about i 75 per cent of ot the royal births 0 0 have been females while among among the common people the tho percentage of or 0 0 males has ban been a over CO GO O P per pr l' l cent which is about the Russian per- per 0 0 for males f q I 0 I 0 The Tho first statistical verification of oC the saying that poor people have 0 0 more children than rich was made b by who after ten years years' 0 0 observation In Norway showed 1 that 0 0 rich families had children o 0 middle-class middle families had children r e 0 poor families had children o 0 The New York Worlds World's statistics for lor Fifth FIlth avenue a as compared with 0 0 the East Side showed a corresponding ratio In 1883 1889 It was found that tho the thoo o 0 greatest difference In this respect was among Parisian women where hf re 0 0 women in the thc dl district given over to working people boro bore children while white 0 o 0 women In tho the la fashionable distrIcts lets bore only 86 child children rem 0 I 0 There is opinion pro and con as to the preponderance of or girl girt children n 0 0 among ur I-ur European ean royalty being due In part to intermarriage Just as thero there 0 0 Js is opinion pro and con as to deterioration resulting from intermarriage 0 o 0 A most noted case proving pro the negative is that of at the Bach family of or 0 0 musicians in which there were several sc men of or genius 0 00 0 0 |