Show RULINGS AND TESTIMONY BOTH FAVOR IN SECOND TRIAL OF NOTED BROMO MUDDLE IN NEW YORK I NEW NEP YORK Oct The t trial as usual opened promptly today j Judge fudge Lambert being In his seat two minutes b before rore 1030 and having to wait walt for Cor the law lawyers ers A big ble crowd chiefly women thronged the corridors and courtroom Charles C C. Hu Hughes hes of the Knicker Knicker- Knickerbocker Knickerbocker bocker becker Athletic club clun testified d that th Cornish Cornish Cornish Cor Cor- nish had made some scurrilous remark remarks re remarks re- re marks mark about l which witness s sr r repeated ed to 1 Charges were made against ag Cornish but hut the they were not sustained d A stron strong point was scored h by the defense de defense ete- ete ense when Justice Lambert ruled out the thc Barnet letters Justice Lambert decided decIded decided de de- that as evidence c the tho letters must be as improper but that he was willing to admit them simply as a n. standard of or comparison in writing The cOlln counsel el for the was highly pleased with this decision which Is In Inline Inline Inline line with that of ot the Court of Appeals which held that the testimony relative to the letters given out at nt the first trial was irrelevant ant Emma Miller the clerk In the stare to In n Newark rk where the silver holder bottle was bought testified that she bhe sold the holder submitted to her but doubted If IC she could recognize the person to whom hom homshe she hall hail sold It It She admitted that she had demanded before she would give gin her testimony Miss Miller remembered rem remembered m hered wiling selling the hol holder pr In question on December r 21 l. l and to a n m man n with gray Jray eyes ps and sandy sanity beard heard She was quite sure was wag Yas not no the man Later Mr Ir Osborne Osbor explained that l Miss 8 Miller was a witness A of or necessity and he did not believe the prosecution should be bound entirely by her testimony mon mony and be barred barrel from cross nation upon the testimony elicited from her b by the defense e. e Justice Lambert held that the prosecution prosecution prosecution prose prose- I cution might show that Miss l Miller l had hadnot hadnot hadnot not always been blen certain about h her r ability abil It ity to say 53 that t the defendant was not th the tho man who bought ht the holder Mr Osborne asked th the witness If she had not duly recorded that she might have been able to the Identify purchaser purchaser purchaser pur pur- chaser two days after aCter the purchase was made but that she Bhe had been so o upset Continued on Page 6 6 I Rulings and Testimony I Continued from page 1 by hy the newspaper the newspaper notoriety that she nhe could not remember anything Miss Miller said It was practically correct Edward lidward Ehrheart a bp In lathe the st store stare re where Miss Miller l Is employed testified that he wrapped up the bottJe holder and handed it to the p purchaser r He lie Is Isa Isa isa a new witness In the case The Thc boy re refused re- re fused tUK to attend previous trials and said his expenses expense were paid for appearing today lie He could not now recognize the purchaser John F. F Tyrrell ll of ot Milwaukee l the handwriting expert was the next wit wit- ne ness fleSS Each of ot the Jurors was at this point furnished with u a book containing photographic productions of or nil the written exhibits In the ca caw cap Prof Prot Turrell Tur- Tur rell reli told In great detail of the methods he had haul employed In studying the comparing com corn paring of or all the disputed and conceded handwriting An adjournment was taken at 1 I |