Show BELIEVE IS i INNOCENT JUROR SAYS j Counsel for the Defence Challenges Tales Tales- stan fan an Who WIio Declares the Ac Ac- used sed Guiltless 1 t 4 44 ORS ACCEPTED IN CASE J Selected r and sworn to try Peter for 1 his life t pH SMITH S1 age 33 merchant residence Granger j J E I age ge 40 io farmer residence e SHURTLIFF a age ae e 61 farmer residence Mil 1111 1 Creek I t s r. r BARLOW BAHLOW age 40 salesman Clark Eldredge Co res- res ke I 1St HEN keR R R. LE flO ROT nOY age 47 41 stationary engineer residence Sa Salt yH y RY Y TRIBE age 65 manufacturers manufacturer agent residence Salt Lake f H t EL cEL KOPP age age 4 49 manufacturing confectioner residence 1 A A. BILLS age 67 61 farmer residence South Jordan t t t t 1 t r oner's counsel In a mur- mur Challenge a juror on the 1 Ii he e believes the defendant often witnessed ta a scene cene not but It occurred this g the trial of Petel Mor Morrs 1 1 a ors rs and the court official ih ia i Ise Judge Morse de debut debut de- de but when the State Stater ij r s lance tance the Juror was exp ex- ex D r p pt I J Juror Excused t nt however that the II all a a. subterfuge to disI dis dis- dis- dis whom the defence v I r for other reasons and 0 s e a a. peremptory chal- chal 3 r ho expressed his belief ens en's ns n's was R. R Dung D D. I ung ug man and a college stuA stu- stu A expression of such Iya Y a Juror since the begin begin- 1 trial It is believed that i h was the real ground of wart warts wart's s objection Examination first first said that what he t ut the ease case had made some someI I Upon pon his but that that- h hat I d from f forming any it spent thirty I I to get him to say that his histo amO amounted to an opinion sU cess ess He then asked J. J em how the deceased have been killed stood tood that he had been Ji f Newspapers read an account of the cir clr- I lead were alleged to have haveL I L of the defendant of the crIme I did that make make- makeup makeup- up- up what Ind what opinion did you reading that was Innocent hink there was enough evlow evl- evl 10 ow 0 that he was guilty guilty's it s still your our opinion opinIon opinIon-is is it itis I His His is Opinion Uld iid take evidence from the theo theto to o i remove that opInion tit now that there is no not note ce e to show the connection nt with the crime with Sd 1 have to Challenge the J Juror wind und nd of Implied bias said C aB 13 Stewart slowly and andr il r expression on his face fr ge e is denied said Judge kly not r resist the chal- chal Honor H nor said District I r a smile case cage remarked the Judge may m-ay be excused r jurors were examined this harles Sharp F F. E E. i Whittaker were excused formed and express expressed d mina atlon of R R. W W. Palmer a a. aW aWe W We t Jordan w was sas as in progress noon recess was taken I ESMEN ARE CD IN THE CASE A Bills a farmer of South th the eighth Juror chosen in isen case I waS was sworn late yesterday rat atthe aLthe the close dose of the eighth C trIal His Ills answers to the theof theof of both sides were direct and andI I he is evidently a man of i 1 gence with a habit of close cloe as Ills His natural as asell shown by his er ans stion t S Surrender n of the Jurors should vote Ith the d defendant and yo you had of his guilt In Ln your Id the tact fact act that you might be h for days cau cause that doubt and vote voter a r was the reply I would It th keyhole by the worms aIr Ir t him without hesi- hesi t t was only after a long and g lion between MorIS Mor- Mor IS his fathers and andE it E Attorney Stewart an- an fence has no challenge cha to o th the the- ors Summoned tili four jurors to be se- se J nother special venire of ye returnable Friday morn- morn rl awn yesterday Just t. t Davidson was the only other chal challenged for cause and axIng ex- ex Ing Ag the he session n of yesterday Attorney used the ro Peremptory challenge change to toI I dispose of him Mr Davidson s answers answers answers an an an- to the attorneys afforded no good ground for challenge but It d devel developed vel- vel that he had been one of the star witnesses In the well well known known Hubbard case case in which Mr Eichnor conducted Continued ed on Page 6 6 I Believe Beleve orten l Morten- Morten sen Is Innocent Innocent Continued fr from m Page 1 1 I Ithe the prosecution and the District District Att Attorney r- r ney nay seemed of the opinion that the State would lose nothing in dispensing I with the services of Mr dr Davidson Eichnor's Narrow Narow Escape One One of Mr Davidsons Davidson's answers enlivened enlivened en en- livened the proceedings for or a few mo me- ments Te The District said You were a wi witness for the defence in the Hubbard case Yes sir I You what I said about you in intha that tha t case 4 j Yes sir and if my wife had been where she could have gotten to you you would not have had as much hair left lef as you o have loday oday Mr smiled cheerfully and furth further r pursuit of this subject t was wa denied de denied de- de e- e I nied by Judge Morse who held it immaterial im im- im- im I material ial to the point under consideration tion ton Believes in R Revelation Cyrus Neff Neff- Nef believed d that James Jaines Sharps Sharp's revel revelation ton was from God and arid thence was e excused Used Robert Holt Hol was as disqualified on account of conscientious scruples against circumstantial evidence evidence evi evi- dence dance and H. H P. P Johnson could not serve because he could not bring himself himself himself him- him self to vote for conviction when the the death death reath penalty was attached The Th following jurors were challenged and excused on on the gr grounds of Implied or actual bias A. A G. G Heyward W. W O. O Crowther A. A S. S Derrick Deorick Thomas Auberry Au- Au berry C. C H. H Jenkins Oron Orson H H. t Pett James Hauerbach-G Hauerbach H H. S. S H. H Hill Hi William R. R R Perry Williard R. R R Burt G. G W. W Turpin R. R R W. W Campbell Campbel E. E 0 O. O Best A. A IE Asper sper J. J W. W De Lano Thomas Thoma P. P Seddon William Wilam Wi- Wi Wil Wil- liam lam S. S rt W W. E. E Jacobs J. J M. M l. l Chamberlain A. A R. R Watson Vatson and nd Henry W. W r. r Brown Has Faint Impression The examination c cf of R. R R W. W Palmer was resumed at t the opening of the af afternoon f ai-f- f- f session and the juror was finally induced to say say that hat he h had hd d a faint impression that at was the guilty man Tinder er this thiS admi admission sion he was excused u upon n the chal challenge enge of the defence I John T. T Alexander Alexandr r a. a of Hunter Is now new under examination Mr 11 Alexander Alxander was absent irl iii ir a at time the of or Hays Hay murder and says that e knows nothing about the case whatever and nd has formed orme no conce concerning ning It I. I He gives giver giveS the impression of an ideal juror and ard will i probably be bei accepted and worn sworn i |