Show SUIT TO ANNUL QUINCY QUICY TRANSFER At Coalville yesterday a suit was filed fled against the Quincy crowd by Mrs Phoebe Phobe A. A Hearst Heart and James B. B Haggin haggin Hag Hag- gin gln through their attorneys Marshall Marshai Royle Hempstead If I the action aton comes I 1 1 to trial it will necessarily involve the West Vest Inasmuch as the p 8 ak k among other things that the trans trans- fe fer of the Quincy to the Daly Daiy West be annulled The defendants In the suit suit are the Putnam Mining company the Quincy Mining company William imam M. M Ferry Henrietta Henrieta McLaughlin as administratrix trix of the te estat estate of D. D C. C McLaughlin W. W W. W Armstrong Armstong James ames T. T Clasby James ames Farrell Farel W. W V. V Rice D. D D D. Er Er- win Henry Newell ewel David Dald Keith and Walter Waiter Scott The plaintiffs seek to annul the conveyance conveyance conveyance con con- made by the Putnam Mining company to the Quincy Mining company corn com co- co pany and the subsequent conveyance of the Quincy Mining company to the Daly West Mining company ask that they be awarded awarded about 7 per cent of ot all al the moneys moneys earned by the Quincy Mining company including which it itIs itis itis is recited has been bEen paid in dividends and of that remained rEmained in the treasury treasur- treasur when hen the thE transfer to the Daly West est was made and that a a. d decree cree b be entered In their favor for six thousand fre five hundred and eighty six one hundred hun hun- died dred ded thousandths part of the stock re received received received re- re or to be received by the Quincy Mining company compan together with wih Interest interest inter Inter- est less les that has been received In Itt the voluminous complaint a recital rectal Is made of the history of the organization tion ton of the Putnam company and the charges of fraud and collusion on the I part of W. W M. M Ferry and the men who I organized the Quincy with wih which the public recently became familiar famia in the I case of or Mrs Moray vs s the Quincy Quicy et al 11 I Mrs Hearst Heart and Mr Haggin claim th that J. J J. J Daly l h had 6 shares a of lit I Putnam t a stock to of r which i R. R C. C Chambers Chami Cham Cham- a fir i 1 1 I bers ber owned half hal and of Chamberss Chambers's I 1 share they owned shares each and andI I Chambers which still remain in his hiso o 0 estate They allege that the officers of J II the Quincy when th they purchased pu the te i Putnam property ii n. n conI conI concealed con con- I 1 its Is r real al great value although th the 1 o plaintiffs believing in the integrity o othe of oft I t the Quincy accepted in payment J for their interests |