Show CLASH CLASHIN IN SUPREME COUT COURI COUNSEL OF ITALIAN GOVERNMENT AND ATTORNEY WILL WANLESS v There was a clash between Attorneys C. C M M. Garwood of D Denver nver and Will F. F Wanless of this city In In the in-the the Supreme court this m morning in c connection with ith the presentation of the app appeal al in the Lynch KIng murder case Mr Wanless Wanless Wan- Wan Jess less who has been at attorney of record rec rec- ord rd for Lynch and g King since their arrest arrest ar ar- ar- ar rest on on the the of murder a a year ear earan an atia Fa A half ago age gOo Object objected strenuously tf r to the appearance of of f Mr Garwood in inthe inthe the case but in vi view viv v of br f the the fact that M Mr M. Garwood is r representing th the ItalIan Italian Italian Ital Ital- ian Government Tov he the he cour court t hed e d that hat he was entitled to appear in the case as a matter of courtesy The trouble began when Assistant General Attorney-General White moved the the admission admission ad- ad ad ad- I mission lon of Mr Gar to tl tl P t bar of I th the Supreme for the purposes s of the c case se and 1 Mr r. r Warless Wanless was upon his feet before Mr White White had had ceased talking Wanless Objects Mn Mr Wanless then said I respectfully respect respectfully fully object if your Honors please to Mr Garwood being allowed to take any part In this case I am satisfied that he has nO no authority to a act t for either of ot the defendants and although it may ap appear r that I am acting with discourtesy to a brother member ot of the bar I am compelled to tOo urge this objection ti tion n. n I have been seriously handicapped at various times since I hay haW been the i attorney in this case case- and f am op opposed opposed op- op posed to tOo further int interference Oil Tro Troubled bled on Waters i k Mr Garwood was then a aed ed to r re reply reply re- re ply and opened b by saying that he deeply regretted the clash clashi ContinuIng Continuing ing he ted e the fact ingi an Italian subject ct that ind-that h p appealed to Sis Sis' for l con con- Mr 1 addE 1 that h w was the representative It tf f th the Ita Ital ian Government in what l as vas as being done for King and that le Ie was In Instructed Instructed Instructed In- In by the government go to a appear ar before the Supreme court md nd render such assistance in in iri the matte as lay laytn jn his power In conclusion Mr Garwood Gar Gal wood poured a little oil all on tie bled ro waters of ot Mr Wan Wanless's leISs's by saying that the brief as by Mr Wanless covered the pints pants completely completely com corn and that he didn't now enow that he hs would desire to addressee court Admitted by Courtesy Mr Garwood was asked b bi the courtat court courtat at atthe the conclusion of his Tel arks if it he tie e was ready to proceed with tie tte case cas and and his reply being in the lv ive Chief Justice Miner said that he ras fas as entitled qed to appear in n the case and the Italian Government as of courtesy This of course closed the incident for the time being The presence of Mr MI was the re result lt of a telegram seit to him by bythe bythe bythe the General Attorney-General on last Jast advising him that the ca cas cac be argued today Mr Garwood arrived In Inthe inthe I the city from Denver at 9 45 and se- se a carriage drove in haste to th thc the c arriving there ther just as the e court was preparing to meet Review of the Case The appe appeal l In the case is from Crom an order ordel order or or- der del of f the trial court overruling the the motion for a a. new trial after the the con- con two t o m rn n non m the har e of ot h having ving murdered Cor CoIn Godfrey pr Jr ws jn in a Commercial street gam gam- house bling-house during an attempted holdup holdup holdup hold hold- up In Sept Serit September 1910 The principal grounds upon which the defendants rely rey f for a evel's l are re three In n number num num- her ber leuIn In th the first firt place it is contended that the information should have setout set setout et out that an an attempt was being made to tomu mu rot the house gambling-house at the time of the killing instead of a bald charge of murder in hi the first degree Again it itis itis itis' itis is is' is urged that the court erred in permitting permitting per per- the testimony of a a. witness to tobe tobe tobe be r read d to the jury instead of having t the e witness ess in court The third ground IS that the lower court erred in answerIng answering answer answer- Ing Ing- certain questions put by a a. juror reg regarding re x's g garding Kings King's true name after the jury had been instructed The case was arg argued ed for the appellants appel appel- Santa lants by Will F F. Wanless and for the State b by A Assistant Attorney General Attorney Gen ral White Court then adjourned until tomorrow to tomorrow to- to morrow morning when Mr Garwood will make an argument for the appellants appel appel- lants ts and Mr White will probably make a brief reply |