Show STATE CHALLENGES JUROR WHO DOES NOT BELIEVE IN SHARP SHARF REVELATION District Attorney used the ninth peremptory challenge of ot the State in the murder case today to excuse a Juror who said sald that James Sharps Sharp's revelation testimony had weakened weakened weakened weak weak- ened the opinion he had formed against the defendant George W. W Proctor a merchant of oC Union the five hundred and eightieth man to sit in the box was wa the subject of ot the challenge When under examination by the defence defence de de- de- de fence tence he answered Attorney Stewart to the effect that when he first read of ot the case the theories as to the defendants defendant's defendants defendant's defendants defendant's defend defend- ants ant's guilt lIt seemed reasonable but that when he learned of ot Sharps Sharp's testimony at the preliminary hearing he virtually changed his mind and became unbiased toward He answered all the usual questions propounded by the in a satisfactory manner and Attorney Stewart said Defence Passed the Juror We e pass the Juror for tor cause District Attorney had Just one question to ask Mr Proctor said he you ou answered answered an en- Mr Stewart that when you read James Sharps Sharp's testimony at the preliminary preliminary preliminary pre pre- hearing that your opinion against the defendant was much weakened weak weak- ened Now ow you know do you not that the question of ot the revelation was not raised by th the prosecution that prosecution that it was brought out by the defence I object said Attorney Stewart ItIs It ItIs Itis is Immaterial by whom the question was raised The defence has gone into it re responded re- re sp Mr Ir Eichnor and I have a alight arIght aright rIght light to examine cross-examine the Juror upon that point I do not care to hear an any argument argument ment said Judge Morse The objection objection objection tion Is sustained Im through said the States State's attorney attorney at at- torne torney pass the Juror The State may take Its ninth peremptory peremptory per per- challenge said the court Excuse Mr Proctor said Mr EIchnor Eichnor Eich- Eich nor with considerable le emphasis and without a seconds second's hesitation These Were Challenged M. M Fitzgerald J. J P. P C. C R. R Reynolds Renolds Frank W. W Jennings George R. R Smith John Green Robert Milne Mime Chillion Miller George W. W Stevenson D. D M M. Naylor and ii Wilt were all challenged challenged challenged chal chal- and excused because they h had d opinions as to the defendants defendant's guilt or innocence Ross lines E. E Armbrust might have hae b been n otherwise accepted bu but t possessed conscientious eon con scruples s against convicting on circumstantial evidence Thirteen jurors had been examined d and excused when the noon recess was taken Change In Restaurants The Jurors who have been and sworn are much pleased please over the change in tn their boarding place After Arter the adjournment of or court yesterday afternoon af at- they registered d a vigorous protest protest protest pro pro- test against the fare they had been re re- re Yesterday afternoons afternoon's session of ot the trial proved to be absolutely devoid old of at a feature of at Interest The entire entire en en- tire panel of ot thirty jurors was excused without a I single Ringle man getting within hailing distance of ot the point of ot acceptance acceptant accept accept- ance t It was as the same saine familiar story of ot opinions already formed and ex ex- pressed The box was as emptied at 3 40 40 and after aCter ordering the fourth open venire of ot fifty returnable this mornIng morning morn- morn Ing the adjournment for Cor the day was waa taken |