| OCR Text |
Show Tii i it i jiisrmcr lointT. Monday Morning In t tin I'nurls of Judges Zane mid Ilarlclt. Tbe trial of D. V, Diamond, charged with a fraudulent use of Ihe malls, was rimmed In Judge Zaue'a court this morning, and will probably run Into tomorrow, as all tho wltncenuj had not Lion examined when tho court ad-ouriicd ad-ouriicd at noon. IJenrge Ij. Douglas et al. vn Georgo A. Alder et al. lly content, dltmletcd as to the Union National bank. llutchtntju, Helta . Co. t. Wm. (Iroetbeck et ul. Answer of the defendant Wm. Orocskeck withdrawn. Ntwburger, ltelea & Co. vs. Win. (ircciUck etal. Answer of Wm.drooi-becli Wm.drooi-becli withdrawn In this ca.o alio. eJcott Hlllott vs. Whlttemore. He-ferreiltoJ. He-ferreiltoJ. II. llarrli, ai referee1, to try all lisuea aud report ftndlugs of fact und cant) liitlons. lu Iheclvll suit of Iieon liaoon, the ex-depuly aherlll, vs. A. J. Hurt, the ex-cou'ity sheriff, threo days more wero given to answer tug omplalnt. lirKUUK JUIHJI2 1IAIITCII. Tho legal arguments In tha mining mlt if Martin McUrath ot al. vs. 1). D. Hrwlnetal. onauurder calling upon thu defendants to show cause why n locelvv, ahould not bu appointed, wero reaumidu luu'clcok this morning be. fnu JiuUo llanoh und occupied uutll I'.'.SH, when the lase waa nutKnUt.nl lo Ihnvoiirl. Tlxiiclliui wm meutlined lurlaturdn'j Ni,w. I'latutlds claim that there is a large tuiuduu tltetu aa procetda Ironl a tiun of the propertied itTnyllower claims Not. 4, fi nnd 7, from June, 1630, lo J miliary, 1691, and further that llio Ucfermauis, c naplrlmr locheatand defraud jilaliitllla, Induce I them to sell their intererta lu the I roperiy for $1U,00J In December, IbSU, wheu it was worm at the tlme$J0iu,-(JO tlme$J0iu,-(JO I, Tiny eak fornoiticellntlouof tho deed and that an accounting bo had In addition to thu rayer for tho appoint-ciu.it appoint-ciu.it of a receiver. ItawlliiaainlCrltchlow nro counsel fortheilahitlllaand HrowmV. lleuder eon aud Dickoou 4. Htouu for thu defense. Tho further hearing of Iho divorce suit of KnlhlnU l'ritsch vs, frauds Krltiuli was tukili iinllilaiifteruuoii Thu trhl began n week or mole nu, but hal to be postpone I uwlug to Judge llarlcil) goluj to Heaver, |
