OCR Text |
Show COURT hIpPENIHGS, Jl An Action Against the Ontario Silver LiinlDg Company; jfl 1 fl tiii: inu tins cuimi.ii $11,100. H lfl Judgo ano Called Upou to Annul , !fl Another Marrlsgo Contract. hH Miscellaneous Notes. ITaH Nothing of very great Importance fllH occurred In Chief Juitlco.inu's court 9 H thla morning, tho only matter uf any atirfl consequence being the trial of a dam- liH et;e suit brought ngalnst the Ontario j''fl Hllrcr Mlulug company by ono of their Hffll employes nt Park City. Following la fU uu outline of the butlncai transacted 3 kfjj! upto thuhourof nJJournmenlt lIU Hi. LUir HI II. j 'fl Tho divorce tult of Fannlo 11.1111- 1 H ling vs. IMwarJ II. Hilling was j VU called fir trial, the complaint iIiowIdr i tl abandonment and failure to support. 1 tH Judgnllurrla wis tho plalnllll'4 at- 1 HH turney. J iH According to the alntemeut cf Mrs. V t-lH Hilling (wliu Is about 18 yeara or age) 9 iTB Ihu j nriten Intetmnrried atQiluny, I'M His, ou October 23. 18JI. OntiieUlti I'll of May, IbUI exactly two i ars ago KaO thudefeudunt deserted her, und sho KrUH has notaeenhlm since, riierolsono x. fltf'fl child Issue of the mirrlijo llUucbe, nn,ud four years, for whose custody n)1 she pruyed. tt'lfl Ttiu court granted tho decreo of ssyjl divorce and awarded the wife Iho fl tssss! care of tho child. jWjH uinmial. li.fl In tho case of B. J. Freldman et el. it ' vaJobuA Qroesbeck, tho mulon for utH Judgment was ordered aud au excep. VH Hon tikeu. nt H M. Woolf vs L. Woclf. Demurrer ',' to complaint submitted un I sustained, ij and leave given ta amend by Interveu- ,m H Hon. Ten days allowed tn answer. 'flflH 1. Furgcrion vs. Uco. Nicholson. iv'issssl Mollou tir a continuance, and con- t!fsssi tlnuancogiantoltlll thuSttu lust. i'l ! Wm. Van Dyko vs W. P. O'Mearo. rftH Leavu given to umend complaint by J ' maklLg Wm. L'. Ilyan n j arty do- (t.L'IH fendaut. !ilaH rtio suit of R. B. Price vs L. M. 4afl Bnolgrove, uu motion of Attorney ' AfH Hurd, for Iho defendant, vtas dismissed j H without roeecullon. 1 1 Hudson Kurulluro company Vltllo jl M Freed Furniture compnor, Motion of j M defendant for a new trial was argued f) M by Judge lloudcrson for the defenuant !j M and by Frank Btepbeua for the plalntltl I fl and suhiullted, 9 M B. Karpen vs tho Darls Furnlturo M M company et al. ly consent Ihe re- 'jkasssi celver In this matter wu allowed com- .1 M lensatlon In the aum cf f.'oU for '.laaaal services renderej, Jll HAiiM.v uonaAN'a shot. SjH Judgu Powers was counsel for the J aBai plalntitr aud Hennolt, Marshall and BaH Uradley repretonted the defendant on 1 B the trial of the case of Harney Morgan li saH vs the Ontario b.lver Mining cominy. j H 'I lie action wus brcught to secure ';'aH J 11, 400 lu couiequeiico of personal tiaB injuries alleged to have been sustained I lfl by Ihe plalutllf, a miner, while em- IXaBl Ployed In the comi any's mine at Park .1 sHl City In January, 1891. Of this amount laBl illOU was said tu have been exendcd flsBl tor medical attendauco and nursing. 1 1 HJ At thu tlmo named, acoardlng to tho laBl plalntlll's statement, ho was wolklug IH ou the 1S0U foot level and while jH In the act of descondlugtlirough tho LB1 wing or malnway Ihu ladder broke, SH causing him lo fall n distance of about HJ nluofeet. Ills thigh was fractured and HI he was otherwise severely Injured. He HJ was confined to his had for upwards of HJ six months havluc beon aallentat isBl Bt. Italy's hosltal and hss ever since laBl been uuablu to follow his occupation. 1HJ His insisted that the accident resulted from the negligence aud carelessness HJ of Ihu defendants In providing a lad- , bH dir which was Insecuru aud tnsuffi- i4sBl clcnt to serve tho purposu for which It 1sbB1 waa Intended, 'iBl lliocato was In progress this after- eisBl noon aud promises to cousumu the on- Hai tlrudai, 'Hal |