| Show iUE SUPREME S COURT 1I 1 ° ° I A Qneslloa InrolTlog tto I Fees of Dlslrtct Court Clerif I > I 1101 hnis lltiut K rrins I lbs Point nt leone oes hue Collrctlcu of lirluln Iorlltni of tin I late i i Tlitrs were uo optIOns binJoJ own by Ihu lull of the ° Territorial 0 upreme flour I thli morning and after 0 be mlaulM ul Krldajn sessIon bad bn read by Clerk lUclutluIr lionori ituned to argument lu the CUt gIven below IU1UHTANT AH TO FiM 1 Ihanrttuttelakeniipwailhatof Ibn j J Uubioob Hlitvi ol America apt tlltnt I a loDI U McMillan John J Dily I and Wordea he N ble leipaudenli Time defendant McMillan was clerk 01 f Ibo rblrd dlttilet court U r tho j oilefen laula bring Uinllei upon till Loud Hull was htouhl bllho Uultiil IIIIN agaluil them to recover an mount alleged to tu duo flow Me IIIUu ai fen I collected IJJ him by vlr unol hUollloeanil 1 III aXCaoo of tbe xeiiie ol till olllce reaiouable clerk lira and f 1000 u year which It wai claImed by shoe pUliilltl was 1 Hut IcMlllin was nnlllled In retain I bli I rrnoual I ooiutieiiialljn the MOb lain aliened mat a ortlou of Ibe ot ens moj for was received by Ihe clerk us leo lu naturalliillun resell ud ha remainder a < feee In civil dull between private tactics In CUll To Ills complaint tho defendant I < iniiirtilou hue grouul that It did not tatu lola mdlcliut tu conitllule a tuin lit action lhuiui > llon < arlilng on the demur nor were lit whether hue uiturallia 1100 ten itcelved by Ibu defendant IcMlllan were roes and emolument of hli ofllcu ai clilk and 2nd whether IhI fen incIre by him as time In ulll bitwreii rlvite arllni woe ucll tees f aol I emolument of hi olllce bat hu was riquliud to account for thu imr Counitl for thn apjillaut now con rndftj that below Jua Ihu couil JulIe lutoli errrd In pining on Ibu de imiirr lobs Honor liolJIng that hu act lu regard to 1 the ftei uf duels ot U 0 1 distrIct oourli did ooul not soly 10 naturalluitluu oatei aLd I lout iliolk nod not bake return of hits Isea I received la Ib1 class 01 Cases In Ihn opinIon of lIme lower cfiurt alio Ihu fees received b > Ibu clerk fur territorial builuriiliouid not I > accounted for btoauiu Ibo United State bad no IlltetMt wliitever la Hiin Counielagain attributed error lure arguing that II tbn United Hlatea bad lbs power tu requIre tile clerk lo count for all fici and umolumenU rucclvetl bl hIm by virtue of hi crlke 1 hued so Intereit in requiring lilni tv account fur lbeiefe uecautu I wa beurfltud thereby A revernl I of Ihu decisIon of tIle court below wa < then torn now lougbt 10fbl appellaut wet repreiented I by i Judge llowatl au 1 this reiiundouU by Attorney W H Dlolion thelatlerof whom la a very forclbl argument Inilited that thou two queitloni arliliig upon thliaiieal 1 win ropurly answered an-swered 10 Ilio negative by the lower court liirlher that IBM received lu oitursobotatiou cnsu war 10 I uo suns 0 fee of Ihu clerk but web I nlJ by Ibo U ri riuirenivcourt la ibainauf IbeUB Y 111 laid the ollrk hy the lartleieeeklugnaiuralltttlou ai com tUeailOn for his irvlci lu booking ovrr the I aprra li aicerliluliig I Ibelr validity l ftio clerk acted m au aid to hoe booth in aiilug en lIme case and hli dutle III tIde Iriiect weiu not cunneclud lu any miuuer wIlls bli dulls I clerk rIe Case was lubuillled alter argument A SOlO AU T TAXI The two taco 01 tho Zion Bxvlogi lImb kud rruloompiuy appollanbi 1 Y to U Hardy exgouniy lax colleu ton definuant I I and reiiKiudeult and Hm vi K J Iionard oIly lax as letiior 01 collector Ibo canie on ° Tliu faoie lu uacb were Ideuli oil aid by mutual agreement bnlweeii oouniel Ibu Iwu alloatu l Were cuuiollduted and 1 argued together Aplellauti weru re reuented by At toriij Hallow 1erguion and Jobu M Cannon County Attorney MUll by md Judge lloge pealed 1 ou lbs other ilde IJI ° Ibe action worn commence In hu Tblrd Ulitrlct coutl nomu tlmn ago when Ib fouls weru fully reported lu these coluuilie Harlug was uad before ex Chief Jui lUntue the plabuiill aeeklug lo ob lain a permanuut luunalonlo reilrilu the d < lun > lanU tram collcllug certain l rllouiuf thu city and county tame on the ground thatthoy wcrellligalfor Ibo reoiualbat Ihe ruerlyoa which audi lanes I woo rsord wis onoupt from laiallou Thou relict prayed lor wu d uled by Julge Zaloe sod au aipoal therefore ukiu to Ibli oouit ful J Cuuuiil for Ibu Hpwlliuli conleudeil among otber malleri Ibal Ibo OUr bolow erred lu holding that Ibu rop > erly of lIme corporation wai lu bu 55 oeeae d at thou 10101 value 01 III cpl lal stock the shires of itock 111 uxHiipt iroui laiallon A uiollon to dliiulii made by lbs luiuouueuin oouuiel on Iho grcund toost lb oontroveny bad bonn already vlllrl except an lo com w arguul mil takeu under advliemeiiuntil i pm and Ihtlr Hotiori Iben dlimltud no ap 1 cal I upon IOu ayweut of coili of Ibli uua tIc lowir vuurl lu bolu Judgo lUrlcli illJ not lit lu till lH lHi OWI adjourned I at 1 2111 till ti morrow morulot |
