Show S r rr Y r T Two wo P. P Points om t S 0 of f V. V View ViewS Jew f il PRESIDENT RESIDENT ROOSEVELT points with pride prida S r 1 j A to the changed chang liberal attitude of the suS supreme supreme su su- su- su S preme court as evidence that the objectives of off judicial reform he sought through his court iii packing bill in 1937 have n w been achieved f i despite defeat of his proposal in the first major majo t S1 1 upset of the admInistrationS administration S 'S The president feels that the changing attitude atti atti- t I t tude of the court proves that he was justified in his effort to chastise the supreme court and j S. S make it behave But there t is another way of looking g at it tt The liberalizing of the court WITHOUT the c adoption of the dangerous device oi ot packing n i it V f with new deal judges proves just as much that tha S 1 t Mr Roosevelt was wrong in 1937 that 1937 that it was not necessary for him to threaten the very basis II I of our democratic government by tampering with the judiciary V It is true that the supreme court has tended V 5 S V ff V V 5 ix t ij L L I i 1 1 at times to be a little too conservative to be beslow beslow beslow slow to adopt liberal trends of public opinion But in so doing it Is fulfilling exactly the function the founders of our government had hadin hadin V in mind when the court was established It was designed as as a a final check on n the often reckless reckless reckless reck reck- less vagaries of a momentarily-enthused momentarily popular popular popular pop pop- ular majority Over the long pull history proves the court courtS S WILL bow to public opinion if it holds steady on a new course And meanwhile it has has' often and will often save the nation ion from its own folly Didn't the court really do just that when it outlawed the then n new w deals deal's N R A |