Show SHEFFIELDS DEMURRER To the indictment Concerning the KtlllDjS of Jot Lonard Aa 151 ISn h 7 O00oel 10 50 Ooua OmIlos sd Ileloslos lInr Jail0 ZuIo 017 The legal argument by oiuuiel on Ihu demurrur lo ludUtment cbarj lug 1rlvato Edward C Hhenield n oldltr itatloned at 1oit Douglat Iltut luck and Bergeant Ilniu with murder In OhIo cond degree namely Ibo kIlling 01 Jce Leonard were nue UforoJudie hosts lImbs moiulug 1 wai In regard lo Ills pulllcular cniaol tibtllleld liowuver that Ibo point 1 ralrtU today Wbeu that deiuudaut I arraigned loot wok buvnleredn 11 Iso ol not guilty nlto a ifwclal plea I in writing of former acquittal olld im urlldlctlon The lull tent of the demurrer woo publbuud In limo cut aol 01 the Niu al thai lmo The prMccuiion today ttii iCIIOI lo repre frnluJ by Aailtanl Dltrlcl Attorury Howt TUB one for the drfenie WIO iu the hal 01 Atloruiy C 1 Varlan Cplalu A C tiharpe JudKoadvoiate of the uinrlmtiiliI ul Ouluiado Atlur Hicburd lucy Win W A Young Ulniau and Attorney limo prvteciillou now I tut In a dr mutter lu lImo 11elal pita uf Iho ili leudnnl Hhtllleld ou Iwo urouiMt lit I that M lar at thu helIum l denied Um jurisdiction of Ihlioutltbe plea wan bail In that It did I not apprar Ilm court liaa nut JurlJIctloll to Iry tlm defem out ft tIm < ollsuos ohnrgrd In the In dlotmeut llut tuch Jurlidlctlon upi I up-i ared uu the lace I ol tlm plea ulIIIrof 2nd Tbut to far at related j In Ibu plea of former nonuli tot tuon pliH ihiwed upoulliifac ihat tho defendant bad not been tiled for Ilm crime charged lu OhIO Indictment by any cUr having lurltdl lion of soIl 1 uUcn e and tliat tlm xouernl couit mrlUI wblch tried tIle defendant defend-ant lor tua aol upou wblcb lIla In dlclmeut wu founded bid no Jurlt dlcllou or nulhorliy la try him for the ctlmu charged In thu Indictment Indict-ment ruu protcciitlns attornny milnlnlnrd that lIla Full Dough i lullltiiry iKcrvullon WAI uol wlililn lime ex cluatVB url llcllon ct Ibu lulled Htaliv and Iho lila Uulled riluloi lImIt given to Ibe ltf > lalulo of Utth furlt duliou nnd control over II lIvery foot ull lIlt Ill 111 orrll ry uelluol M wee IncludeJ lu Ills l1i i aIn lion olmimr lImo lltlo Kllll remained lulu lu-lu United Huler wninnirrlerrUorlul urlalitl < u Court aril IMm I laid bid uu Inherent riiht to uulili for miy oUt except tu lo so wti pro Iuttl ly ad luf Ilomrepo Attorn y Varlan In I hli reply held tlmt wheru the uiliulnnl alt woo not only an oUuiiHi ngalntt millUry law nud discipline flit altu conilltuled H civil oriuie ninlnil wclelv and was iiummllted under the Jurltilitiou nf Ihu oils vurlllly la Ilili oi > o tho United BUlm Ihu otluuJer might bo tried lu lImo civil court or by 1 court martial Inc very art of I Cuugrtoi huvlng euareu n Uv prohibiting > the Lltnu imf murder wIthin a furl Woes lii couiendeil ul lliwlf an ntttrllou vl I o clutlvojurlMllctlun Judge Adv > cnt I Hbariefull wedaid I Attorney II W YOUIIK WM Hddremlug Ibo court wheiiadlourninent woo taken for Iho noun rtcew Attorney Ulmau next rmo ultli 111 lUKumlil aud AMlttuiit I Jill Atloruvy llowai tundu ilju bla Hunt reply for tlm protecu iljuTho matter woo nutinlltiJ toJudje advevuieut iuu at a2J hood by bin taken uuder |