| OCR Text |
Show Till! "MAYROWEII." X Ilauiagrj hull AriaciUnlof the Itrccnt Siloing l.lllgatlun. An Important suit has been filed In Hie Third District Court, the title of thu cause being David Keith el a I. vs. tjtuart Hteveusou and John Ldugnnld, It la art forth In the complaint that tho defotidahta wire aud nro In the loesreslen, as loJeece, of two mining claims known rectlvely aa May-llowir May-llowir Nee. 5 aud 7, and that they pus-teracd pus-teracd the right to ixtract, a1 and otherwlso dlsjioio of all ores that might U found In either or both of said mining claims. That on the Slat day of January, Ml, lu an action brought by Kira Tbeaipaou et al. vr. David Keith it al., a restraining order and Injunction waa laaued from thla court upon the Ihrn defendants (now plaintiffs) In thla action, retrain, lug Iheni from entering In or working, raining or extracting ores front a certain ledgu or lode having sliver or other metal., alleged lu the complaint to have been found adjacent to certain other claims meiitlontd aa the Northland North-land mining claim, lot &0t, and the Nevada mining claim, lot cot, It being claimed that Ihe aald Mayflower ledge orlodedlpidln a northwealerly direction, di-rection, which If truo would carry salt' vein or lode on Us din undtr aud through tbe said Mayflower mining elaltiis No.. 7 aud S. Plalnlltts furlhir allege tbat Ihe lode mentloued In the complaint of said action did not have Ita top or atx within ellherthe Northland North-land or Nivada mining clalma, but that Its dip paeavd under and through tho aald Majflaw rr mlnlug claims Nue. 7 and fi. .lhat by reaaou of the Injunction In-junction tbe defendants wero retrained retrain-ed from extracting ore from aald Ma)-flower Ma)-flower claims, unless they executed hondstolheplalntlll.ln audi sum aa tbe court deemed eunlclcnt. Thatlater, 011 April II, 1SW, the court adjuditeii that such restraining order was uolju.l, etc. That the plaintiffs In the iaso agreed to Rive tho defendants, In conslderalloa ol tke laaulug of ealJ restraining order, n bend In the sum of $3000 to Indemnify them from lo.a theleof. That later a laind waa given byplalntiilalntho sum ol SIS.OUO fur thnaauiepurjioBv. ' PlalnllUa In Iho priaent action therefore claim that the Injunction t,e-firred t,e-firred tohaailamaged Iheni In a sum exceeding f IS,l, and tlwy aak for that amount of damages wllh costs of suit additional. Another similar action la filed In ol'Junitlon wllh Ihe above suit by David KvlUiilal.M. Kira Thompson et al , asking fjr $jima Uamagea, com. plalut and conditions telng the same. |
