| Show = THE SUPREME COURT The Drlur Mercaoille Coapany Milt U Old Ajiln AN OLD JIIMM UNTItO > CltbV I Ii a ton or Allfc < J Hrticli of Coolrict An tclloa Aetlnit OcJt ClOy All IbeJuJfn wile In heIr placet 011 lbs blb ur lIe opeoloi of today to-day seeu Ion of the territorial Hu iremocourt and all of them tat Our log the arguments In the lint cue ou Iho 111 No olnlont were handed down Ihli morning IIAUKU FIIAUUUM AMIIINMKXT h UL 00ieh5l OlciCadO eO e 5ed1 0101 ho Urlvtr Mercantile Co of Hall lisle Cly and W I Jlumlugton assigner ret < oudenti HutheilaudA Howal J 1 Hteph n lloolh lee and dray and W T luuttr were altorneja for Ibo tpiel Ionic Couniel for Ibe iei ndenlt were H I Lewis W I Dlckon audI 1 aud-I aMoCallum Thli wai an apreal from the JudR ment of Ihe Third dlilrlct courl Judge ZsnrII au action to sot ailde o i fraudulent cad void the anlRU ment for the benefit ot creditor made by thu Uilvrr Mercantile Co On 3 March 27 IbM thin comiany eieeuled a deed of atilgnment 10 Ittmlnglon iitklDg him a referred creditor for 1226 and Inlereit Appellanlt were rtdlloriof Iba oarapany and belie lag tha anlg iment to bo fraudulent In act aud void at agtluit them dliri garded lie ttoii brought atlaohraent ul and atttched tha irojioilyu I Iba saignevslinde Hubinuetitljr an ac Ion lu equity wai brought by appel tonIc In which I was ailed tout a re > culver be pointed Iho aiiUnment sat sill snu 11cc 1101 rlull hy the focalver front Ih sub I or Ibe 51 lobP tOIII h 1I1llhul1I 0on all j attaching creditor file allege lon of fraud by Obese creditor were that the refirencei In lbs aitlgnment Seer the Individual less deblidutit of Kit Cluto the manner and not of lice torui any 11 Upon lha trial the lowtr court luui d that the f 2226 itt forth ca lice debt due by Ihe flyer oompany lo Hcmlngtou wti not a valid claim agtluit Iho former but that Itch fraudulent tnleul ou lice 110 of the com auy and Ibe ttllcen thereof there-of was hot known lo 011 I artlcU atod In by Itemlugton or auy of tho credltori A a cunoloabul 01 law I the trial judge ouud that tbo Miltumtiit intde by lbt campauy la Ilemlngtou thebeuefl of In creditor was bona lode cad valid but that In I regard 10 Itnnlng toui prefoired 10 he take nothing htreou Iho Ibo referred claIm ol Chub Mat alio Illegtl and helakonotli ug Arbor 1 1 ariont was 1lnlell reoelver and Hemlngtou to whom 1 ho propttly cuss ordered turned Lover by tbo rtcolverwai allowed hit cotu ai otiUnee Tho contention of tbe appellant It I hit the deed of tiilgnmenl having been made with frtululnl Intent ou he hurl 01 Ibo corpoiallou abed lltofll cert COd Under the Utah itttute totally void and tint tho creditor whom II was tougbl 10 defraud hail bo right to dlirrgard such aiilguuient abiolululyand attach AN OLD Ullll VANOR rhe next Ole argued wai that of Joseph Itullatl plalulin end reti nod I ent M IhoHocltlo Anouymo dee Millet do tiexlugtun defeudaut and apol tnt I tntMarihall V T lloyle for the appellant Itlchard II riholsrd and II O Hliep ard Judge Cherry aud Judge lljw man for Ibo reipoudeuti Atlal from Ibo Third 1111111 Judge llnlcb Tho action wai originally brought by llullall akalnit lice Old I elegra h IDle III Co aud U livlguluo After ward hI leave ul cold lha oonij lain wai amended by dlmmtlng at lu tbo Old Telrgraih sod mating tho prtten defendant company defeudaulaluttead Ou October Oil 1891 trIal was had loforaa Jury who fount for lha plain III In tl a turn ot oUOU and costa bill without any InlernU A motion for a new trial was oveiruled aol I au apjtt hkan ton 1110 lurlosu of raverilng tho ludgmeut ou leveral tlligetl orrort The clrcutsisluac In this itto hive lees I revlouily 1 given lu lIens colunmi The litigation arliei out of Iho loiiloir of a certain l0bt101001 tho Old felegrtpb win which It I located lu lllughaui canyon tothe ltl lilollll for 1kl lurpoi ofdevelojlng I theiauioand taking oul ore for a period ol three iiioiithi unde ooudltlout let forth In thee ooutrtct IIi Ii alleged howuyer that al llb end 01 1 dtj tight day the derendenti unlawfully unlaw-fully compelled plalntlU lo null work ilk sod mlulng ore and outlod him frouithepremlitt Tha total amouii cliluied ai dauiaet wai I8M3 l HI lttsfsi sod cosis I ACTION AUA1MIT UUIILX CITY y I O Uroomr I lalutlfl aud appellant appel-lant y Ogden City dtfendaut aud reipondent llieeden and Idnnell allorneya for Iho former II 1 Whljilo attorney latter for tbo 11 Aiictllroin 1ourlh dlitrlcl Judg lujuly U IbO lbs ililullll we over atlug a ttnuury In Ogdiu In Inn tlderatlon I hiwovtr of Iho urantlng 10 him by leiio of a cerliln I tract IK 01 daiewbefe ly lbs ely oouncll he agreed to remove tho Itnntry thtrelo and eitibllibed II I at a coil title may > of JIOO Al the lime cot leiio I wti executed there Were iprlngiol water on Iho leaned laud and upon lull water lalntlu I relied a Ibo only 505117 lor ruuulug lilt boil uii ttliaorrod that lice oiy lid Dol own aid hid no control over Ibe Wuter of which fact Ulullll had 110 knowdKa uull nor Ito llloul 01 the Uuueri clod that lie hat hocus shoe dor rivejot I by I artlet who have made a lucceiitul oialm lalMIU itatiit lit ouool thereloro oierate ties lAme and cliluid damaged In Iho tun ofWSIW lice late wa referred 10 30 Judge Ikireultn 50 referee Who e I 1 4 bound Ihet Here wit no h tell is of coy nanln In the lease I by lice de eidantt and that plilut If bad alltd lo make out a cauio of ctlon Judge Miner enleiel judgment Judg-ment Ia accordance wllh hit finding asd refuted to grant a new trial lencothli appeal AUOUMT or Ila njun In the cue ol Ihe Fed W Wocalh Co vo Iho Hall Like Clly llrewliijt oapprlltnl Ihe bond on writ of error to Ibo riuiremoCoutl cf lbs Coat United JW HIdes was flied at 0000 |
