OCR Text |
Show THK UMOX PACIFIC'S VEIISIOX. llio (oniluctor Had a lllght lo Tako up the Tlckcls Sold lo Sir. Sneiuoii and Son. Regarding the statement olU.Bwcn-ton, olU.Bwcn-ton, of J.akn View, Utah county, who claims to liavo been unfairly treated at the hand of a Union l'aiiriuconductor, In the purchase, on the II 111 Inst, of conference return tickets for hi wlfo and ton, Mr. Hurley says; 'The truth of the matter Is that tbo ronduotor had a jarfect right to take up tho tickets be had told to Mrs. Bwcnsouaud son at exouralon raits, Uf course lie rnadu a mlstaku In Belling the lloLils lu thu first place, as tho 11th waa not Included lu tha ordera re-itlved re-itlved from the comuny'a headquarters head-quarters lu Umaba, and 1 Issued to coi.duitor on the local division, as will be seunby the following ilrcular letter sent to all cur conductor Hait Ljlkk Cur, April 8, 1SJ3. To Conductors, Ulah Division: This lotlor Is your authority for selling oxcursiou ttokeUi tu halt I-ako al rutes named In circular No. 7,troni ike View, tiprlngvlllo, llenjamln and Hautamilii, on April 10 h, lllli and ITlli, limning all ticket for return until April -iJili. Vours truly, I) liln.in.i-r, General Agent 'So far a the local division I con-cirned con-cirned we would havo made no ol Ice tlont i telling tlcketa ou thullth, tut e aro controlled by cur auperlora. 'Iheconduitor ou having madeamli-Into madeamli-Into had thu aamo right lo correct It aa auy other person ha. Had he fillvd ho would havo been hold er- trim reoii'lliV totheoomia v fir l.. tt ir rciieo betwi-ell t in Iwn il isris 'ftlik a It la a a i n mh jhe tu ey ' it til eta oia wind fjr leu day u'ler purchise aa amor I'uir lo pre-eiit or m Uiey will bo void oftir trio Ml i linl Aa to the telephone mi iraga rtfrrred (e I 'cliikeiy liwdlstloclly lepva'oj the istv named In the nlxtvn clrrular, am nlvnuilttllig tue 11th an I adilitl tlmtilciili Moult Lo void at r tin -"tb 1 he empany couiedes tmtt tbu dl'iuto might be ntrrjweil Uowu lu i quutlon of vet-' vet-' 1 lutiiti t elr e-ioik and Mr. Mwiiiou son in-law; but Inasmuch a they uera carefully oUjIu thu Iniiruitioiia from liraiiqiiarleM oir the Utah dlvlilou II hrirs that tho Union 1'acllla hai the ttct ot the argument. " n i re It no aih antao lutii Ireatlng ourtrous illscourleouily," Mid Mr. llnrl y, "(Jii tho lontrary, wo ore dilmusof ollrrlug Hum all the com-fori com-fori and cottverilaiios porilble, I tin orry the luliuuiirrslandlng occurred. If It v,uu iwsiltljto iruTPthalotir man who anaaired tho teltphonu had glveiithi wrong data wevmuUhave biin onlj urn pleated tn mnko good the illllerein.e. An I, lu laot, could that a I iralloubo eatnblished evi n at this late date we wot II see that Mr.Bnen-nn Mr.Bnen-nn was nut the I acr, but as It la, 1 am entlffled the Union lVclfli) Is lu. irrar no further than being the victim of a mlsunJerstan Hug for which It wtt uotrcepontillt." |