| Show THE DISTRICT COURT The Lts KollZ InlanC Honey Still Under DebAte JLIIIII IllltHJI I His ItlMUIiM J trIte Agalntt lie II A 1 I Illll cool u e II a lortnrr I niplojr Un Atcounl of Slog There Lure been no new develop ranti III Ua uate of Ibo lemon American InturancaUJ of New York vi bout ICullli the blaring of which wes agiin taken up biforaChlif Jut lice Merrill an J a jury thli nnmlng Much the noon teitlnnny that wa alducej at Ibo criminal trial of Kjllli oua charge of anon li I being Introduced over again Ihe ilalntlDi seeking to thow that Iba defendant whrn ha luiurel Ilia premliei In luetllon majafilie repreiibtalloui In regard to tba value ul the Hock and nxlurei and llul he hlnnelf wai teiponiltlo fjr Ihe lire whIch paillilly ooummed llbD The amount which letnllili I detlre to recover as pildup luiuranca money li I 11117 Inlereit and coiti Tha cue will occupy qulla another il t r before II reachee Iha Jury aiioiir OHUIIU A t Illaka ve Ibe Itocky founUln Oil C In Ihli cue 1 was ordered IbatartJellver bond be furnltbed In the lowN turn of J1OI ilily days being 1 A A IVolieth ye lIe 1atterton lItoJollo adiyalJIllonal anr lime allowed the A ci AIM run WAUIM Judge Hutch huh returned from O dtu and tbli morning with a jury Iliteued U the evIdence 1Iuo 101 forward I on 10 btlol 01 al arlhun brought by William A Cooper agalnit tba Denver and lImo Uraiida HillroaJ Co to rioover Ilia turn of Slo with Inlereit Irim March lit IbM alleied to I duo for servIces rendered by tlalntlllaia clerk 1 and 1 lHWkkeeer during the miinlha IbUI of Januiry and 1utirtmy Allorney Krank 1lerce repreunted Iha plalnilll Allorney Inompiou with whom wai Judge l IIenatt ape eared on behalf of the defendant com I any I The defenia denied bat plalntlS woiked for Hum In the oipaclly named built admitted I I that dunug the 0 raimtu ol January Ib91 he wai In I 1 lhelreniloy ai cousIn of 1 Ito eoirte I OIU ohIo In thom clly lot whlcbha was tu lecelva Ihe turn of ISO and which amount had I r fully paid oo him I all li I claimed however lint plaintiff wai lucomlent lo dltcharga tha dull re < lulrJ of him and Ibit by bli nrgllgaomc be occssloaed great Ion lo lIsa coniiny builueii I Al soon ai IbIs waidlicuvered lalutlll waidltcbirged aud Ibo amount then due blm ai waicei applied 1 In lorll1 Mlllcmnl of the I Usrause d 1 by Isle Incomielency which latter ny the defendant farexcce any claim ha hai agalntl them Rir < ie ante Ue 110 the company r limit time plalntlll at Ibo end l of hli employ meui wai unable tu account for a IIIKU mm belonging to them vIa5 111191 Deducting the f JO due lo deeudant ai waxen Ihe defelldanll claim there li I illll owing them from him JWI91 and for 1115 they k Judgment with lutereitaud I cxuli Ihttjury founJ for tIme plalnllirin i beauiu 01 11 WO and Iblrly day I clay wia KIIIlt I rolre ahansual 5 00 01100 lot a Imew 111 f i 9 UlinUIUIKIC AUAIV The cacao 1 U I A Hawyervi John A Uroeibeck he I ou trial lefureaury S I lu Judge lunch court Ihli allernoou 1 Illl an action to recover S 203 ou a IS 1 romkory note wllli Inteteil CUNIIMI1U 9 The cue of Jernei 1 llrlckion vi 1 J Lrkkion et al wai loulluued Illl the loth lad I Jamei C Mtv anlfnce vi Archie train Cuntloued tha term Ul CUISLST jooullb Wa lIObr Co vs J toorge IV Cotslsg 1 al liy om000151 die I Iil I lillidOd a IIt elI JI cOrelS i il 0orge IV UuIslosg slid judgoisat JUIWOI d i i nIetsd agaInst I hubs hum f 306 IIY cTIlUlATho I IIULATII I Charlei llujer el al I V lIon Mlllir 1 al 1 Judgment ai I wr ttlj ulatlou 82 00 and coil I I |
